ArticleHeliyon2024
Evaluation of stored red blood cell quality after washing using immune indices.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Coming clean: should adults undergoing cardiac surgery be transfused point-of-care washed allogeneic red blood cells?Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Washed red blood cells (RBCs) can be used to treat immune-related diseases. However, whether the washing process changes the quality of RBCs and affects the curative effect of transfusion therapy remains unclear. We retrospectively analysed the clinical data of patients who received blood transfusion. The physiological and biochemical parameters of RBCs were tested on an automated haematology-biochemical analyser. CD47 and phosphatidylserine (PS) plasma membrane expression were analysed using flow cytometry. Morphological changes in RBCs were observed using scanning electron microscopy. The results showed that the curative effect on patients who received washed RBCs was weaker than that on those who received non-washed RBCs. Physiological and biochemical parameters of RBCs were not significantly different. RBC immune indices changed significantly after washing. The expression of "don't eat me" signals was weakened, whereas the intensity of "eat me" signals was enhanced. This study suggests that the current use of physiological and biochemical parameters as indicators to evaluate the quality of RBCs may not be comprehensive and that evaluation of the real status of RBCs requires other effective parameters. Immune molecules in RBCs are expected to become supplementary markers for evaluating RBC quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.