Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38881982›Full record

ArticleJournal of registry management2024

Summary of Veterans Health Administration Cancer Data Sources.

Leah L Zullig, Shelley A Jazowski, Neetu Chawla, Christina D Williams, David Winski, Christopher G Slatore, Alecia Clary, Kelli M Rasmussen, Leann M Ticknor, Michael J Kelley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of registry management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Leah L ZulligDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.
Shelley A JazowskiDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Neetu ChawlaCenter for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Christina D WilliamsDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.
David WinskiDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.
Christopher G SlatoreVA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon.
Alecia ClaryDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.
Kelli M RasmussenUniversity of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Leann M TicknorAsheville VA Medical Center, Asheville, North Carolina.
Michael J KelleyDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

HSRD VA CDA 13-025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is a leader in generating transformational research across the cancer care continuum. Given the extensive body of cancer-related literature utilizing VHA data, our objectives are to: (1) describe the VHA data sources available for conducting cancer-related research, and (2) discuss examples of published cancer research using each data source. Methods: We identified commonly used data sources within the VHA and reviewed previously published cancer-related research that utilized these data sources. In addition, we reviewed VHA clinical and health services research web pages and consulted with a multidisciplinary group of cancer researchers that included hematologist/oncologists, health services researchers, and epidemiologists. Results: Commonly used VHA cancer data sources include the Veterans Affairs (VA) Cancer Registry System, the VA Central Cancer Registry (VACCR), the Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW)-Oncology Raw Domain (subset of data within the CDW), and the VA Cancer Care Cube (Cube). While no reference standard exists for cancer case ascertainment, the VACCR provides a systematic approach to ensure the complete capture of clinical history, cancer diagnosis, and treatment. Like many population-based cancer registries, a significant time lag exists due to constrained resources, which may make it best suited for historical epidemiologic studies. The CDW-Oncology Raw Domain and the Cube contain national information on incident cancers which may be useful for case ascertainment and prospective recruitment; however, additional resources may be needed for data cleaning. Conclusions: The VHA has a wealth of data sources available for cancer-related research. It is imperative that researchers recognize the advantages and disadvantages of each data source to ensure their research questions are addressed appropriately.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsRegistriesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsHumansInformation SourcesUnited StatesVeterans Healthdata sourcesneoplasmsoncologypopulation healthresearch methodsVeterans Health Administration

Identifiers

PMID38881982
PMCPMC11178113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.