Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38881964›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024

Integration of Virtual and Traditional Medical Education: Scholarship Pivots from the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Ipek Berberoglu, Sherry Y Q Tang, Jeffrey H Kozlow, Billur Sezgin, Gurjit Sandhu, Paul S Cederna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ipek BerberogluFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sherry Y Q TangSection of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Jeffrey H KozlowSection of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Billur SezginFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Gurjit SandhuDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Paul S CedernaSection of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic required an unprecedented transformation of medical education, shifting from traditional, in-person learning to distanced, online learning. This study aimed to review changes to medical education and describe the advantages and disadvantages of virtual medical education experienced by medical students during the pandemic. Methods: An online survey study was conducted at two medical schools, University of Michigan Medical School in the United States and Koc University School of Medicine in Turkey. Medical students completed questionnaires regarding their educational experience before and during the pandemic. Survey instruments were designed to assess differences in the educational curriculum, study methods, clinical skills self-evaluations, perceptions of the quality of in-person and online learning, and overall satisfaction. Results: A total of 184 medical students completed the survey. There was an increase in the use of online study tools since the pandemic. There was no statistically significant difference in self-reported assessments of clinical preparedness and overall clinical competence during surgical clerkship. The percentage of students interested in pursuing a career in surgery has nearly doubled from 34% to 63%. A majority of students (83%) believed that the time available for self-study and research increased during the pandemic. Fifty-two percent of students believed that online education is less efficacious than in-person education, but 86% of students still preferred a blended approach. Conclusions: Medical schools have continued to update their curricula following the COVID-19 pandemic. This study illustrates the transformations in medical education to ensure that the most effective and suitable teaching is delivered.

Identifiers

PMID38881964
PMCPMC11177807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.