ArticleTranslational cancer research2024
Association between the serum uric acid levels and prostate cancer: evidence from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2010.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prostate cancer risk and antioxidant biomarkers: the age-dependent reversal of bilirubin's role.BMC urology · 2025Article
- Relationship between uric acid and colon cancer risk: Dose-response analysis and mechanisms.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- A two-stage model for precise identification and Gleason grading of clinically significant prostate cancer: a hybrid approach.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2025Article
- Association between magnesium depletion score and prostate cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Association Between Serum Uric Acid Levels and Skin Cancer: Results from NHANES Data and Mendelian Randomization Analysis.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Uric acid may play a critical role in protection against cancer by the suppression of inflammation. The association between serum uric acid (SUA) levels and prostate cancer risk is debatable yet has received little attention in the American population. Therefore, we used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to determine their correlation. Methods: Using information from NHANES 1999-2010, a total of 62,160 individuals from the general population were included in this cross-sectional study. Additionally, a number of covariates were acquired. Prostate cancer was used to divide the participants into two groups: prostate cancer group (n=315) and non-prostate cancer group (n=7,545). A weighted adjusted logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine the potential correlation between SUA and prostate cancer. Results: Our study comprised a total of 7,860 participants. After full adjustment for confounders, SUA was not significantly associated with prostate cancer [odds ratio (OR) 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-1.00, P=0.058]. In participants aged 60 years and above (≥60 years), a higher SUA was significantly associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer (OR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.80-0.96, P=0.003). However, among those younger than 60 years (<60 years), there was no association between SUA and prostate cancer risk (OR 1.29, 95% CI: 0.69-2.42, P=0.42). In addition, in the subgroup analysis stratified by body mass index, hypertension and diabetes, there was no significant correlation between SUA and prostate cancer. Conclusions: SUA is negatively associated with the risk of prostate cancer in older men, especially for those 60 years of age and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.