Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38881821›Full record

ArticleFamily relations2024

Juvenile probation staff perceptions of engaging families in substance use services.

Kaitlin N Piper, Jennifer Pankow, Jennifer D Wood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family relations, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kaitlin N PiperDepartment of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Jennifer PankowInstitute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX.
Jennifer D WoodDepartment of Criminal Justice, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

TRIALS Coordinating Center to Reduce Substance Use, HIV Risk Behaviors, & CrimeU01DA036221 · NIDA · CHESTNUT HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. · PI DENNIS, MICHAEL L., SCOTT, CHRISTY K · 2013 to 2019
$5.6M
Translational research to increase service access for NYS juvenile probationersU01DA036226 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WASSERMAN, GAIL A · 2013 to 2017
$3.8M
Temple University Center for Adolescent Implementation ResearchU01DA036225 · NIDA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI BELENKO, STEVEN R · 2013 to 2017
$3.6M
KIIDS: Knowing about intervention implementation in Detention SitesU01DA036233 · NIDA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DICLEMENTE, RALPH J, SALES, JESSICA A · 2013 to 2017
$3.5M
The Lifespan/Brown Criminal Justice Research Program on Substance Use and HIVR25DA037190 · NIDA · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI CURT G BECKWITH · 2014 to 2026
$3.5M
Kentucky TRIALS Research CenterU01DA036158 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI LEUKEFELD, CARL G · 2013 to 2017
$3.4M
Texas Research Initiative for Adolescents in the Legal System (TRIALS)U01DA036224 · NIDA · TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY · PI KNIGHT, DANICA K · 2013 to 2017
$3.2M
Recidivism of Justice-Involved Youth in Mississippi County Juvenile Courts Participating in JJ-TRIALSU01DA036176 · NIDA · MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ROBERTSON, ANGELA A · 2013 to 2017
$2.5M
Organizational and Environmental Factors Influencing the Implementation of Evidence Based Practices in Juvenile Justice SettingsR21DA044378 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BOWSER, DIANA, MCCOLLISTER, KATHRYN E · 2017 to 2018
$431k
Adoption of Family-Driven Substance Use Services in the Juvenile Justice System: A Pre-Implementation AssessmentF31DA053005 · NIDA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI PIPER, KAITLIN · 2021 to 2022
$93k
NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA053005NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA044378NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA037190NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA036158NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA036176NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA036221NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA036224NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA036225NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA036226NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA036233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Study objectives were to (a) understand juvenile justice staff members' experiences with engaging families in youth substance use services and (b) identify staff-perceived barriers to family engagement across steps of substance use service provision. Background: Lack of family involvement in juvenile justice system substance use (SU) services is a key barrier to successful treatment of justice-involved youth. Method: From June through November 2015, 33 focus groups were conducted at juvenile justice system probation sites across seven states. There were 263 participants, which included juvenile justice probation and behavioral health staff. Results: Strategies to engage families in services were highly variable across the 33 juvenile justice sites. Juvenile justice staff members identified barriers to family engagement in SU services including family discomfort, distrust of juvenile justice staff, lack of family service compliance, difficulties accessing SU services, lack of transportation, insurance and cost barriers, low perceived need for treatment, lack of SU education, and SU treatment stigma. Conclusion and Implications: Barriers to family engagement directly impact the success of SU service provision in juvenile justice settings. Implementation of strategies to engage families of justice-involved youth (e.g., providing tangible, informational, and emotional support to families, and involving families in juvenile justice policy and care decisions) are critical to improving SU outcomes among this vulnerable population.

Indexed as

family engagementjuvenile justiceprobationsubstance use

Identifiers

PMID38881821
PMCPMC11175584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.