Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38881750›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental hazards (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2024

Multi-directional communication between decision makers and environmental health researchers: a qualitative inquiry.

Carrie Leach, Amy J Schulz, Nicholas Schroeck, Susie Lawrence, Sharon Sand, Guy Williams, Oluwatosin A Bewaji, Robin Fuchs-Young

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental hazards (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carrie LeachCenter for Urban Responses to Environmental Stressors, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Amy J SchulzUniversity of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Nicholas SchroeckCenter for Urban Responses to Environmental Stressors, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Susie LawrenceWayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Sharon SandUniversity of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Guy WilliamsDetroiters Working for Environmental Justice, Detroit, MI, USA.
Oluwatosin A BewajiDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, College Station, TX, USA.
Robin Fuchs-YoungDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, College Station, TX, USA.

Funding

Strategic Vision & Impact on Environmental HealthP30ES017885 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Dana Dolinoy · 2011 to 2026
$21.3M
Pilot Project ProgramP30ES020957 · NIEHS · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RUNGE-MORRIS, MELISSA A · 2014 to 2021
$10.1M
Research BaseP30DK092926 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MARY ELLEN MICHELE HEISLER, ADESUWA B OLOMU · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092926NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES017885NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES020957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been three decades since key leaders gathered to pave a path toward healthier and more just environments and recommendations were made to improve communication between scientists and community stakeholders who can influence decision making. Since that time, community engaged research has flourished while building the capacity of researchers to engage in the work of making change to those environments has lagged. The purpose of this study was the development of guidelines to inform interactions between researchers and decision makers and influencers who participate in the policy change process. This community engaged, pragmatic and iterative inquiry includes insight from a review of existing resources and key informant interviews. Resulting guidelines were piloted, and formative evaluation by community stakeholders informed and resulted in refinement to the guidelines. Strategies for communicating and disseminating scientific evidence are presented as well as tactics that sensitise researchers to the nuances of policy makers' realities so they may serve as a resource for dealing with complex information and decisions. We provide tactics and archived resources in an on-line toolkit that we have cultivated over time to foster effective communication between scientists and those who have a stake in ensuring that decisions are evidence informed.

Indexed as

advocacyCommunity engaged researchenvironmental science communicationpolicy communicationpublic communication

Identifiers

PMID38881750
PMCPMC11177721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.