ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2024
Development and Validation of an In-Hospital Mortality Prediction Model for Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Community-based prediction models of cardiovascular events, acute exacerbations and all-cause mortality in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis on behalf of the International Cardiovascular and Respiratory Alliance.BMJ open respiratory research · 2026Pooled it
- Predictive models for mortality readmission events and cardiovascular complications in patients with COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Development and internal validation of a nomogram for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Development and Internal Validation of a Nutrition-Related Indicator-Based Prediction Model for in-Hospital Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with AECOPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
- Predicting the frequent exacerbator phenotype in COPD: development and validation of a multicenter real-world prediction model.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often face unknown risks during acute exacerbation of the disease (AECOPD), which could potentially result in mortality. This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram model for predicting the risk of in-hospital mortality in AECOPD patients. Patients and Methods: Clinical data of patients hospitalized at The Second People's Hospital of Wuhu City for AECOPD between January 2013 and December 2022 were retrospectively collected. Variables underwent selection through LASSO regression and multivariable logistic regression to develop a nomogram model. The model's predictive performance was assessed using the concordance index, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA), with internal validation conducted using the bootstrap method. Results: A total of 1224 patients were included in this study, with 98 (8%) deaths occurring during hospitalization. LASSO regression identified 11 variables, used to construct model A. Further multivariable logistic regression was conducted to select variables with P < 0.05 to establish model B. model B was selected as the final model based on discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility, encompassing variables including acute respiratory failure, lung cancer, heart rate, hemoglobin, absolute neutrophil count, serum albumin, blood urea nitrogen, and serum chloride. The nomogram model achieved a concordance index of 0.858. Internal validation of the model was conducted using the bootstrap method with 500 repetitions, resulting in a concordance index of 0.851 (95% CI: 0.805, 0.893). The calibration curve demonstrated a good fit, with a Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test P-value of 0.520. Moreover, DCA findings suggested patient benefit within a threshold probability range of 0.02 to 0.73, with a maximum net benefit of 0.07. Conclusion: The model constructed in this study has good predictive performance, which helps clinical doctors identify patients at high risk of death early.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.