Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38881698›Full record

ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2024

Aesthetic Procedures and Psychological Wellbeing in Saudi College Students: An In-Depth Exploration.

Nouf F Bin Rubaian, Abdelaziz M Elfaki, Serene R Almuhaidib, Fajar A Aldulijan, Raghda S Qasim, Khalid Nabil Nagshabandi, Heba Yousef Al-Ojail, Shayma S Alsubaie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nouf F Bin RubaianDepartment of Dermatology, King Fahad University Hospital, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Abdelaziz M ElfakiHealing Icon Center, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
Serene R AlmuhaidibDepartment of Dermatology, Dammam Medical Complex, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Fajar A AldulijanDepartment of Family Medicine, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-9110-5294
Raghda S QasimDepartment of Dermatology, Dammam Medical Complex, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid Nabil NagshabandiDepartment of Dermatology, College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0008-6577-6463
Heba Yousef Al-OjailDepartment of Dermatology, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0874-9003
Shayma S AlsubaieKing Fahad University of Petroleum and Mineral, Interdisciplinary Research Center for Finance and Digital Economy, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Minimally invasive aesthetic procedures are widely popular among the youth. Despite their prevalence, there is a significant gap in the research concerning the relationship between these procedures and psychological wellbeing, as well as an insufficient exploration of the barriers and motivators influencing their adoption, this study aims to address these gaps. Methods: This cross-sectional study has utilized a secure online survey directed at Saudi university students as the target population. The survey was consisting of 18-item electronic questionnaire including of 4 parts (demographical data, history of psychological illness and screening of current psychological wellbeing using WHO-5 well-being tool, history of doing cosmetic procedure, or willingness to do in the future, barriers and motivators to do cosmetic procedures), and it was distributed across multiple social media platforms. Results: A total of 8443 college students completed the study questionnaire. Exactly 1096 (13%) of the students underwent a cosmetic procedure. The most reported procedures were laser hair removal (9.1%), filler (5.3%), skin boosters (2.8%), and Botulinum toxin A injections (Botox) (2.6%). The most ranked motivators were being painless, with no side effects (8.8 out of 10), followed by being free (8.0 out of 10) and enhancing self-confidence (7.4 out of 10). Conclusion: No significant difference recorded at the overall psychological well-being score between who underwent cosmetic procedures and who did not.

Indexed as

aesthetic procedurescollege studentscosmetic dermatologic procedurescosmetic dermatologymental healthpsychological wellbeingSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID38881698
PMCPMC11178093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.