ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024
Prediction of microbe-drug associations based on a modified graph attention variational autoencoder and random forest.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multi-view feature fusion framework with interpretable graph convolution for predicting microbe-drug associations.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Structure-sensitive transformer and multi-view graph contrastive learning enhanced prediction of drug-related microbes.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- KGCLMDA: a computational model for predicting latent associations of microbial drugs using knowledge graphs and contrastive learning.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The identification of microbe-drug associations can greatly facilitate drug research and development. Traditional methods for screening microbe-drug associations are time-consuming, manpower-intensive, and costly to conduct, so computational methods are a good alternative. However, most of them ignore the combination of abundant sequence, structural information, and microbe-drug network topology. Methods: In this study, we developed a computational framework based on a modified graph attention variational autoencoder (MGAVAEMDA) to infer potential microbedrug associations by combining biological information with the variational autoencoder. In MGAVAEMDA, we first used multiple databases, which include microbial sequences, drug structures, and microbe-drug association databases, to establish two comprehensive feature matrices of microbes and drugs after multiple similarity computations, fusion, smoothing, and thresholding. Then, we employed a combination of variational autoencoder and graph attention to extract low-dimensional feature representations of microbes and drugs. Finally, the lowdimensional feature representation and graphical adjacency matrix were input into the random forest classifier to obtain the microbe-drug association score to identify the potential microbe-drug association. Moreover, in order to correct the model complexity and redundant calculation to improve efficiency, we introduced a modified graph convolutional neural network embedded into the variational autoencoder for computing low dimensional features. Results: The experiment results demonstrate that the prediction performance of MGAVAEMDA is better than the five state-of-the-art methods. For the major measurements (AUC =0.9357, AUPR =0.9378), the relative improvements of MGAVAEMDA compared to the suboptimal methods are 1.76 and 1.47%, respectively. Discussion: We conducted case studies on two drugs and found that more than 85% of the predicted associations have been reported in PubMed. The comprehensive experimental results validated the reliability of our models in accurately inferring potential microbe-drug associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.