ArticleOphthalmology science
Automatic Measurement and Comparison of Normal Eyelid Contour by Age and Gender Using Image-Based Deep Learning.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning-based Assessment of Eyelid and Periorbital Parameters: Assisting Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in Blepharoptosis.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- VisionMetric Suite for periocular measurement in ophthalmic plastic surgery: a preliminary single-center validation study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The Usefulness of AI-Based Cornea Exposure Rate (CER) Analysis Utilizing the Anigma View System in Evaluating Ptosis Surgery Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- AI-driven Eyeball Exposure Rate (EER) analysis: A useful tool for assessing ptosis surgery effectiveness.PloS one · 2025Article
- Multidimensional quantitative characterization of periocular morphology: distinguishing esotropia from epicanthus by deep learning network.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Open-Source Periorbital Segmentation Dataset for Ophthalmic Applications.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to propose a fully automatic eyelid measurement system and compare the contours of both the upper and lower eyelids of normal individuals according to age and gender. Design: Prospective study. Participants: Five hundred and forty healthy Chinese aged 0 to 79 years in a tertiary hospital were included. Methods: Facial images in the primary gazing position were used to train and test the proposed automatic system for eye recognition and eye segmentation. According to the 10-millimeter diameter circular marker, measurements were transformed from pixel sizes into factual distances. Main Outcome Measures: Midpupil lid distances (MPLDs) every 15° of all participants were automatically measured in both genders (30 males and 30 females in each age group) by the proposed deep learning (DL)-based system. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were performed to assess the agreement between the automatic and manual margin reflex distances (MRDs). The eyelid contour, eyelid asymmetry, and palpebral fissure obliquity were analyzed using MPLD, temporal-versus-nasal MPLD ratio, and the angle between the inner and outer canthi, respectively. Results: The measurement of MRDs by the automatic system excellently agreed with that of the expert, with ICCs ranging from 0.863 to 0.886. As the age of the participants increased, the values of MPLDs reached a peak in those in their 20s or 30s and then gradually decreased at all angles. The temporal sector showed greater changes in MPLDs than the nasal sector, and the changes were more significant in females than in males. The maximum value of palpebral fissure obliquity appeared before 10 years in both genders and remained relatively stable after the 20s ( Conclusions: The proposed DL-based eyelid analysis system allowed automatic, accurate, and comprehensive measurement of the eyelid contour. The refinement of eyelid shape quantification could be beneficial for future objective assessment preocular and postocular plastic surgery. Financial Disclosures: The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.