Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38881605›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

Automatic Measurement and Comparison of Normal Eyelid Contour by Age and Gender Using Image-Based Deep Learning.

Ji Shao, Jing Cao, Changjun Wang, Peifang Xu, Lixia Lou, Juan Ye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ji ShaoEye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases, Zhejiang Provincial Engineering Institute on Eye Diseases, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jing CaoEye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases, Zhejiang Provincial Engineering Institute on Eye Diseases, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Changjun WangEye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases, Zhejiang Provincial Engineering Institute on Eye Diseases, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Peifang XuEye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases, Zhejiang Provincial Engineering Institute on Eye Diseases, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Lixia LouEye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases, Zhejiang Provincial Engineering Institute on Eye Diseases, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Juan YeEye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases, Zhejiang Provincial Engineering Institute on Eye Diseases, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to propose a fully automatic eyelid measurement system and compare the contours of both the upper and lower eyelids of normal individuals according to age and gender. Design: Prospective study. Participants: Five hundred and forty healthy Chinese aged 0 to 79 years in a tertiary hospital were included. Methods: Facial images in the primary gazing position were used to train and test the proposed automatic system for eye recognition and eye segmentation. According to the 10-millimeter diameter circular marker, measurements were transformed from pixel sizes into factual distances. Main Outcome Measures: Midpupil lid distances (MPLDs) every 15° of all participants were automatically measured in both genders (30 males and 30 females in each age group) by the proposed deep learning (DL)-based system. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were performed to assess the agreement between the automatic and manual margin reflex distances (MRDs). The eyelid contour, eyelid asymmetry, and palpebral fissure obliquity were analyzed using MPLD, temporal-versus-nasal MPLD ratio, and the angle between the inner and outer canthi, respectively. Results: The measurement of MRDs by the automatic system excellently agreed with that of the expert, with ICCs ranging from 0.863 to 0.886. As the age of the participants increased, the values of MPLDs reached a peak in those in their 20s or 30s and then gradually decreased at all angles. The temporal sector showed greater changes in MPLDs than the nasal sector, and the changes were more significant in females than in males. The maximum value of palpebral fissure obliquity appeared before 10 years in both genders and remained relatively stable after the 20s ( Conclusions: The proposed DL-based eyelid analysis system allowed automatic, accurate, and comprehensive measurement of the eyelid contour. The refinement of eyelid shape quantification could be beneficial for future objective assessment preocular and postocular plastic surgery. Financial Disclosures: The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Indexed as

Automatic measurementDeep learningEyelid contourFacial images

Identifiers

PMID38881605
PMCPMC11179404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.