ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2024
Comparative analysis and classification of highly divergent mouse rDNA units based on their intergenic spacer (IGS) variability.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-quality assembly of the Chinese white truffle genome and recalibrated divergence time estimate provide insight into the evolutionary dynamics of Tuberaceae.Genome research · 2025Article
- Organism-Specific Sequence Motifs Link Ribosomal RNAs to Brain Disorders.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Analysis of a Novel Human Protein, ORF3, Encoded by Spacer rDNA.Journal of molecular evolution · 2025Article
- Assessing Human Ribosomal DNA Variation and Its Association With Phenotypic Outcomes.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ribosomal DNA (rDNA) repeat units are organized into tandem clusters in eukaryotic cells. In mice, these clusters are located on at least eight chromosomes and show extensive variation in the number of repeats between mouse genomes. To analyze intra- and inter-genomic variation of mouse rDNA repeats, we selectively isolated 25 individual rDNA units using Transformation-Associated Recombination (TAR) cloning. Long-read sequencing and subsequent comparative sequence analysis revealed that each full-length unit comprises an intergenic spacer (IGS) and a ∼13.4 kb long transcribed region encoding the three rRNAs, but with substantial variability in rDNA unit size, ranging from ∼35 to ∼46 kb. Within the transcribed regions of rDNA units, we found 209 variants, 70 of which are in external transcribed spacers (ETSs); but the rDNA size differences are driven primarily by IGS size heterogeneity, due to indels containing repetitive elements and some functional signals such as enhancers. Further evolutionary analysis categorized rDNA units into distinct clusters with characteristic IGS lengths; numbers of enhancers; and presence/absence of two common SNPs in promoter regions, one of which is located within promoter (p)RNA and may influence pRNA folding stability. These characteristic features of IGSs also correlated significantly with 5'ETS variant patterns described previously and associated with differential expression of rDNA units. Our results suggest that variant rDNA units are differentially regulated and open a route to investigate the role of rDNA variation on nucleolar formation and possible associations with pathology.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.