ArticleCirculation2024
Deep Learning for Echo Analysis, Tracking, and Evaluation of Mitral Regurgitation (DELINEATE-MR).
Article in Circulation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- PRIME 2.0: Proposed Requirements for Cardiovascular Imaging-Related Multimodal-AI Evaluation: An Updated Checklist.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2026Guideline
- Unimodal to multimodal: a systematic review of predictive machine learning models for valvular heart diseases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- AI-augmented cardiopulmonary point-of-care ultrasound: a narrative review for pulmonary and critical care clinicians.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026Article
- Point-of-care echocardiography screening for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using automated deep-learning analysis.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Detection of Left Ventricular Outflow Obstruction From Standard B-Mode Echocardiogram Videos Using Deep Learning.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Accuracy of machine learning models for mitral regurgitation severity assessment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Review
- Automated echocardiographic detection of mitral valve prolapse and mitral regurgitation with video-based artificial intelligence algorithms.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Automated Echocardiographic Detection of Congenital Heart Disease Using Artificial Intelligence.Circulation · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in echocardiography: Applications and future directions.Fundamental research · 2026Review
- Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Structural Heart Disease.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Review
- Automated Classification of Mitral and Tricuspid Regurgitation With Explainability and Real-World Practice Experience.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Multimodal multi-instance learning for cardiopulmonary exercise testing performance prediction.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Automated Echocardiographic Detection of Mitral Valve Prolapse and Mitral Regurgitation with Video-based Artificial Intelligence Algorithms.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-enhanced echocardiography in cardiovascular disease management.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Multi-view deep learning for echocardiogram interpretation.Nature cardiovascular research · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Based Automated Echocardiographic Measurements in Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Automated Echocardiographic Detection of Congenital Heart Disease Using Artificial Intelligence.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- The Emerging Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Assessment of Valvular Heart Disease with Cardiac Imaging.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- A Deep Learning Model to Identify Mitral Valve Prolapse From the Echocardiogram.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Recent advances in omics-based research of mitral valve disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence, particularly deep learning (DL), has immense potential to improve the interpretation of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most common valvular heart disease and presents unique challenges for DL, including the integration of multiple video-level assessments into a final study-level classification.
methodsA novel DL system was developed to intake complete TTEs, identify color MR Doppler videos, and determine MR severity on a 4-step ordinal scale (none/trace, mild, moderate, and severe) using the reading cardiologist as a reference standard. This DL system was tested in internal and external test sets with performance assessed by agreement with the reading cardiologist, weighted κ, and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for binary classification of both moderate or greater and severe MR. In addition to the primary 4-step model, a 6-step MR assessment model was studied with the addition of the intermediate MR classes of mild-moderate and moderate-severe with performance assessed by both exact agreement and ±1 step agreement with the clinical MR interpretation.
resultsA total of 61 689 TTEs were split into train (n=43 811), validation (n=8891), and internal test (n=8987) sets with an additional external test set of 8208 TTEs. The model had high performance in MR classification in internal (exact accuracy, 82%; κ=0.84; area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, 0.98 for moderate or greater MR) and external test sets (exact accuracy, 79%; κ=0.80; area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, 0.98 for moderate or greater MR). Most (63% internal and 66% external) misclassification disagreements were between none/trace and mild MR. MR classification accuracy was slightly higher using multiple TTE views (accuracy, 82%) than with only apical 4-chamber views (accuracy, 80%). In subset analyses, the model was accurate in the classification of both primary and secondary MR with slightly lower performance in cases of eccentric MR. In the analysis of the 6-step classification system, the exact accuracy was 80% and 76% with a ±1 step agreement of 99% and 98% in the internal and external test set, respectively.
conclusionsThis end-to-end DL system can intake entire echocardiogram studies to accurately classify MR severity and may be useful in helping clinicians refine MR assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.