Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38881342›Full record

ReviewActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2024

Clinical trials in older patients with cancer - typical challenges, possible solutions, and a paradigm of study design in breast cancer.

Peeter Karihtala, Aglaia Schiza, Elena Fountzilas, Jürgen Geisler, Icro Meattini, Emanuela Risi, Laura Biganzoli, Antonios Valachis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Peeter KarihtalaDepartment of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. Peeter.Karihtala@hus.fi.
Aglaia SchizaDepartment of Oncology, Uppsala University Hospital and department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Elena FountzilasDepartment of Medical Oncology, St. Luke's Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Jürgen GeislerInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway & Akershus University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Lørenskog, Norway.
Icro MeattiniDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology and Breast Unit, Oncology Department, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Emanuela RisiDepartment of Oncology, Hospital of Prato, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Italy.
Laura BiganzoliDepartment of Oncology, Hospital of Prato, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Italy.
Antonios ValachisDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeWhile the prevalence of older breast cancer patients is rapidly increasing, these patients are greatly underrepresented in clinical trials. We discuss barriers to recruitment of older patients to clinical trials and propose solutions on how to mitigate these challenges and design optimal clinical trials through the paradigm of IMPORTANT trial. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis is a narrative review of the current literature evaluating barriers to including older breast cancer patients in clinical trials and how mitigating strategies can be implemented in a pragmatic clinical trial.

resultsThe recognized barriers can be roughly divided into trial design-related (e.g. the adoption of strict inclusion criteria, the lack of pre-specified age-specific analysis), patient-related (e.g. lack of knowledge, valuation of the quality-of-life instead of survival, transportation issues), or physician-related (e.g. concern for toxicity). Several strategies to mitigate barriers have been identified and should be considered when designing a clinical trial dedicated to older patients with cancer. The pragmatic, de-centralized IMPORTANT trial focusing on dose optimization of CDK4/6 -inhibitors in older breast cancer patients is a paradigm of a study design where different mitigating strategies have been adopted.

interpretationBecause of the existing barriers, older adults in clinical trials are considerably healthier than the average older patients treated in clinical practice. Thus, the study results cannot be generalized to the older population seen in daily clinical practice. Broader inclusion/exclusion criteria, offering telehealth visits, and inclusion of patient-reported, instead of physician-reported outcomes may increase older patient participation in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsPatient SelectionResearch DesignAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID38881342
PMCPMC11332548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.