Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38881340›Full record

ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2024

Health-Related Quality of Life in Danish Cancer Survivors Referred to a Late Effects Clinic: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Lærke Kjær Tolstrup, Karin B Dieperink, Marieke Van Leeuwen, Sören Möller, Linnea Fechner, Line Helene Clausen, Thea Otto Mattsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Identification of high-impact chronic pain among cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study using the Graded Chronic Pain Scale framework.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Professional Roles in Danish Clinics for General Late Effects After Cancer-A Qualitative Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lærke Kjær TolstrupDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense Denmark. laerke.tolstrup@rsyd.dk.
Karin B DieperinkDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense Denmark.
Marieke Van LeeuwenDivision of Psychosocial Research & Epidemiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Sören MöllerDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense Denmark; Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark.
Linnea FechnerDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark.
Line Helene ClausenDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark.
Thea Otto MattssonDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Region of Southern Denmark has recently established four late effects clinics to help cancer survivors suffering from complex and severe late effects. This study aimed to capture and analyze the full range of physical, mental, and psychosocial issues using patient-reported outcomes. Moreover, we aimed to describe demographic data and the type and severity of the late effects.

methodsA prospective cohort study was conducted among cancer survivors referred to a late effects clinic. Before their first appointment, patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life cancer survivorship core questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-SURV100). We compared mean scores of the EORTC QLQ-SURV100 scales that were comparable to the scales/items from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire with norm data for the Danish population and EORTC reference values.

resultsAll patients referred to the clinic within its first 2 years were included (n = 247). The mean age was 57 [23-85] years and 74% were females. The most common cancer diagnoses was breast cancer (39%). The five most commonly reported late effects were fatigue (66%), pain (51%), cognitive impairment (53%), sleep problems (42%), and neuropathy (40%). A total of 236 of the patients entering the clinic completed QLQ-SURV100. They reported significantly worse mean scores on all scales compared to the Danish norm population and EORTC reference values for pretreatment cancer patients, p < 0.001. Effect sizes were moderate or large for all scales.

interpretationIn this study, we collected demographic data and described the late effects presented by the patents referred to the clinic. Moreover, we captured and analyzed the full range of physical, mental, and psychosocial issues using QLQ-SURV100. Patients referred to the Late Effects Clinic (LEC) had a number of late effects and reported a significantly lower health-related quality of life compared to the general Danish population and patients who have just been diagnosed with cancer, suggesting the aim of helping patients suffering from late effects gain a better quality of life is in dire need.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsQuality of LifeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDenmarkFatigueFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProspective StudiesSleep Wake DisordersSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID38881340
PMCPMC11332500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.