ArticleCancer medicine2024
Comparison of clinical and MRI features of brain metastases between ALK+ and ALK- NSCLC.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- [Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Brain Metastases from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with Actionable Gene Alterations in China (2025 Edition)].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2025Guideline
- Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of brain metastases from lung cancer.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Comparison of clinical and MRI features of brain metastases between ALK+ and ALK- NSCLC.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNon-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the primary cause of brain metastases (BM). This study aimed to investigate differences in clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of BM between anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene fusion (ALK+) and ALK wild-type (ALK-) NSCLC, and to preliminarily assess the efficacy of radiotherapy for treating BM.
methodsA retrospective analysis included 101 epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)- NSCLC patients with BM: 41 with ALK gene fusion and 60 being ALK-. The brain MRI and clinical features were compared between different ALK status using the multivariate analysis, and a nomogram was constructed to predict ALK gene fusion. Fifty-six patients who did not undergo cerebral surgery and had complete pre- and post- treatment data were further divided based on whether they received radiotherapy. Log-rank test was used to compare the short-term effect of treatment between the two groups under different genotypes.
resultsALK+ BM exhibited decreased peritumoral brain edema size, lower peritumoral brain edema index (PBEI), and a more homogeneous contrast enhancement pattern compared to ALK- BM. Age (OR = 1.04; 95%CI: 1.02-1.06), time to BM (OR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.04-2.14), PBEI (OR = 1.26; 95% CI: 0.97-1.62), smoking status (smoking index >400 vs. non-smoking status: OR = 1.42; 95% CI: 0.99-2.04) and contrast enhancement pattern (OR = 1.89; 95% CI: 1.28-2.78) were associated with ALK gene fusion. A nomogram based on these variables demonstrated acceptable predictive efficiency (AUC = 0.844). In the ALK+ group, patients who received radiotherapy did not show increased disease control rate (DCR) or progression-free survival (PFS). In contrast, in the ALK- group, those who received radiotherapy had improved objective response rate (ORR), DCR, and PFS compared to those who were only treated with systemic therapy.
conclusionsThe clinical and MRI features of BM can indicate the status of ALK in NSCLC. In the ALK- group, patients who received radiotherapy showed higher ORR, DCR, and PFS compared to those who did not.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.