Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38881247›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2024

Real-time quantification of in vivo cerebrospinal fluid velocity using the functional magnetic resonance imaging inflow effect.

Tyler C Diorio, Vidhya Vijayakrishnan Nair, Neal M Patel, Lauren E Hedges, Vitaliy L Rayz, Yunjie Tong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Human deep sleep facilitates cerebrospinal fluid dynamics linked to spontaneous brain oscillations and neural events.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Amplitude fluctuations of cerebrovascular oscillations and CSF movement desynchronize during NREM3 sleep.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. CONMR in biomedicine · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tyler C DiorioWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6371-9424
Vidhya Vijayakrishnan NairWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Neal M PatelWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Lauren E HedgesWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Vitaliy L RayzWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Yunjie TongWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.

Funding

3T MRI Scanner dedicated to Life Sciences ResearchS10OD012336 · OD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI DYDAK, ULRIKE · 2015 to 2015
$2.0M
Image based modeling of biomechanical factors for risk assessment of developing periventricular white matter hyperintensitiesR21AG068962 · NIA · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI TONG, YUNJIE · 2021 to 2021
$423k
NIA NIH HHS 1R21AG068962-01A1NIH HHS S10 OD012336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vivo estimation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) velocity is crucial for understanding the glymphatic system and its potential role in neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease. Current cardiac or respiratory-gated approaches, such as 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), cannot capture CSF movement in real time because of limited temporal resolution and, in addition, deteriorate in accuracy at low fluid velocities. Other techniques like real-time phase-contrast-MRI or time-spatial labeling inversion pulse are not limited by temporal averaging but have limited availability, even in research settings. This study aims to quantify the inflow effect of dynamic CSF motion on functional MRI (fMRI) for in vivo, real-time measurement of CSF flow velocity. We considered linear and nonlinear models of velocity waveforms and empirically fit them to fMRI data from a controlled flow experiment. To assess the utility of this methodology in human data, CSF flow velocities were computed from fMRI data acquired in eight healthy volunteers. Breath-holding regimens were used to amplify CSF flow oscillations. Our experimental flow study revealed that CSF velocity is nonlinearly related to inflow effect-mediated signal increase and well estimated using an extension of a previous nonlinear framework. Using this relationship, we recovered velocity from in vivo fMRI signal, demonstrating the potential of our approach for estimating CSF flow velocity in the human brain. This novel method could serve as an alternative approach to quantifying slow flow velocities in real time, such as CSF flow in the ventricular system, thereby providing valuable insights into the glymphatic system's function and its implications for neurological disorders.

Indexed as

Cerebrospinal FluidMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultFemaleHumansMaleBOLD fMRIcerebrospinal fluidCSF flowinflow effectrespirationventricular system

Identifiers

PMID38881247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.