Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38881170›Full record

ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2024

Strategies to address inequity of uncorrected refractive error in the Western Pacific: A modified Delphi process.

Ian McCormick, Kelvin Tong, Nurliyana Abdullah, Carmen Abesamis-Dischoso, Theresa Gende, Effendy Bin Hashim, S May Ho, Isabelle Jalbert, Belmerio Jeronimo, Elenoa Matoto-Raikabakaba and 13 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Deep learning-empowered low-cost portable automated refraction system: A solution to the inadequate effective correction rate of refractive errors in resource-limited areas.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Ian McCormickInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7360-3844
Kelvin TongInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Nurliyana AbdullahPAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam.ORCID 0000-0001-7230-4618
Carmen Abesamis-DischosoThe Professional ODs Society, Pasig, Philippines.
Theresa GendeDivine Word University, Madang, Papua New Guinea.
Effendy Bin HashimDepartment of Eye and Vision Science, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3444-4764
S May HoThe Fred Hollows Foundation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Isabelle JalbertSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1351-0072
Belmerio JeronimoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Guido Valadares National Hospital, Dili, Timor-Leste.
Elenoa Matoto-RaikabakabaColonial War Memorial Hospital, Suva, Fiji.
Koichi OnoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Prabhath Nishantha PiyasenaDirectorate of Policy Analysis and Development, Ministry of Health, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Jaymie T RogersSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
John SzetuThe Fred Hollows Foundation New Zealand Regional Eye Centre, Honiara, Solomon Islands.
Minh Anh TranDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Dennis Yan-Yin TseSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7561-9121
Ye WinSight for All, Yangon, Myanmar.
Tiong Peng YapIGARD Vision Therapy Centre, Singapore City, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-8395-7542
Sangchul YoonDepartment of Medical Humanities and Social Sciences, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
Mayinuer YusufuDepartment of Surgery (Ophthalmology), The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Matthew J BurtonInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1872-9169
Jacqueline RamkeInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5764-1306
Promoting Equity in Refractive Error Services in the Western Pacific Study Group

Funding

Indigo Trust IND539RocheWellcome Trust 207472Wellcome Trust 207472/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUncorrected refractive error is the leading cause of vision impairment globally; however, little attention has been given to equity and access to services. This study aimed to identify and prioritise: (1) strategies to address inequity of access to refractive error services and (2) population groups to target with these strategies in five sub-regions within the Western Pacific.

methodsWe invited eye care professionals to complete a two-round online prioritisation process. In round 1, panellists nominated population groups least able to access refractive error services, and strategies to improve access. Responses were summarised and presented in round 2, where panellists ranked the groups (by extent of difficulty and size) and strategies (in terms of reach, acceptability, sustainability, feasibility and equity). Groups and strategies were scored according to their rank within each sub-region.

resultsSeventy five people from 17 countries completed both rounds (55% women). Regional differences were evident. Indigenous peoples were a priority group for improving access in Australasia and Southeast Asia, while East Asia identified refugees and Oceania identified rural/remote people. Across the five sub-regions, reducing out-of-pocket costs was a commonly prioritised strategy for refraction and spectacles. Australasia prioritised improving cultural safety, East Asia prioritised strengthening school eye health programmes and Oceania and Southeast Asia prioritised outreach to rural areas.

conclusionThese results provide policy-makers, researchers and funders with a starting point for context-specific actions to improve access to refractive error services, particularly among underserved population groups who may be left behind in existing private sector-dominated models of care.

Indexed as

Delphi TechniqueRefractive ErrorsAdultFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle Agedaccessequityfinancial protectionrefractionrefractive errorspectacles

Identifiers

PMID38881170
PMCPMC7618279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.