Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38880909›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2024

Dirus complex species identification PCR (DiCSIP) improves the identification of Anopheles dirus complex from the Greater Mekong Subregion.

Manop Saeung, Jutharat Pengon, Chatpong Pethrak, Saranya Thaiudomsup, Suthat Lhaosudto, Atiporn Saeung, Sylvie Manguin, Theeraphap Chareonviriyaphap, Natapong Jupatanakul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Manop SaeungDepartment of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jutharat PengonNational Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Chatpong PethrakNational Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Saranya ThaiudomsupNational Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Suthat LhaosudtoDepartment of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Atiporn SaeungParasitology and Entomology Research Cluster (PERC), Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Sylvie ManguinHSM, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Theeraphap ChareonviriyaphapDepartment of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand. faasthc@ku.ac.th.
Natapong JupatanakulNational Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), Pathum Thani, Thailand. natapong.jup@biotec.or.th.

Funding

Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute FF (KU) 14.64National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) N42A670406Thailand Program Management Unit for Human Resources & Institutional Development, Research and Innovation (PMU-B), NXPO B17F640002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Anopheles dirus complex plays a significant role as a malaria vector in the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS), with varying degrees of vector competence among species. Accurate identification of sibling species in this complex is essential for understanding malaria transmission dynamics and deploying effective vector control measures. However, the original molecular identification assay, Dirus allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (AS-PCR), targeting the ITS2 region, has pronounced nonspecific amplifications leading to ambiguous results and misidentification of the sibling species. This study investigates the underlying causes of these inconsistencies and develops new primers to accurately identify species within the Anopheles dirus complex.

methodsThe AS-PCR reaction and thermal cycling conditions were modified to improve specificity for An. dirus member species identification. In silico analyses with Benchling and Primer-BLAST were conducted to identify problematic primers and design a new set for Dirus complex species identification PCR (DiCSIP). DiCSIP was then validated with laboratory and field samples of the An. dirus complex.

resultsDespite several optimizations by reducing primer concentration, decreasing thermal cycling time, and increasing annealing temperature, the Dirus AS-PCR continued to produce inaccurate identifications for Anopheles dirus, Anopheles scanloni, and Anopheles nemophilous. Subsequently, in silico analyses pinpointed problematic primers with high Guanine-Cytosine (GC) content and multiple off-target binding sites. Through a series of in silico analyses and laboratory validation, a new set of primers for Dirus complex species identification PCR (DiCSIP) has been developed. DiCSIP primers improve specificity, operational range, and sensitivity to identify five complex member species in the GMS accurately. Validation with laboratory and field An. dirus complex specimens demonstrated that DiCSIP could correctly identify all samples while the original Dirus AS-PCR misidentified An. dirus as other species when used with different thermocyclers.

conclusionsThe DiCSIP assay offers a significant improvement in An. dirus complex identification, addressing challenges in specificity and efficiency of the previous ITS2-based assay. This new primer set provides a valuable tool for accurate entomological surveys, supporting effective vector control strategies to reduce transmission and prevent malaria re-introducing in the GMS.

Indexed as

AnophelesPolymerase Chain ReactionAnimalsAsia, SoutheasternDNA PrimersMalariaMosquito VectorsSensitivity and SpecificityDNA PrimersAllele-specific PCRAnophelesDirus complexITS2MalariaMisidentification

Identifiers

PMID38880909
PMCPMC11181648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.