Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38880839›Full record

SynthesisProgress in orthodontics2024

Influence of elastomeric and steel ligatures on periodontal health during fixed appliance orthodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Umar Hussain, Alessandra Campobasso, Muhammad Noman, Shamsul Alam, Rida Mujeeb, Sofia Shehzad, Spyridon N Papageorgiou

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Progress in orthodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational Study of the Association Between OralJournal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Umar HussainSaidu College of Dentistry, Swat, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8100-561X
Alessandra CampobassoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4726-8816
Muhammad NomanSharif Medical and Dental College , Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9359-7050
Shamsul AlamHealth Department Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7410-3852
Rida MujeebFatima Memorial Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-2070-6331
Sofia ShehzadCommunity Dentistry, Sardar Begum Dental College, Gandhara University, Peshawar, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5190-2114
Spyridon N PapageorgiouClinic of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center for Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Plattenstrasse 11, Zurich, 8032, Switzerland. snpapage@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1968-3326

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMetallic and elastomeric ligatures are widely used in orthodontics to secure the archwire within the bracket slots, but elastomeric ligatures have traditionally been associated with increased microbial colonization, which could adversely affect periodontal health.

aimThis systematic review compares the periodontal effects of elastomeric and steel ligatures used for orthodontic fixed appliances.

methodsUnrestricted literature search of 7 databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Virtual Health Library) up to July 2023 were performed for randomized / non-randomized clinical studies on humans comparing the two ligation methods during fixed-appliance therapy. After duplicate study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment with the Risk of Bias (RoB) 2 or the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool, random-effects meta-analyses of Mean Differences (MD) or Standardized Mean Differences (SMD) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were carried out, followed by assessment of certainty of existing evidence with the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

resultsA total of 11 studies (3 randomized / 8 non-randomized) with 354 patients (mean age 14.7 years and 42% male) were included. No statistically significant differences were seen for plaque index (5 studies; SMD = 0.48; 95% CI = -0.03 to 1.00; P = 0.07), gingival index (2 studies; MD = 0.01; 95% CI = -0.14 to 0.16; P = 0.89), probing pocket depth (2 studies; MD = 0; 95% CI = -0.17 to 0.16; P = 0.97), or Streptococcus mutans counts (4 studies; SMD = 0.40; 95% CI=-0.41 to 1.20; P = 0.21). Elastomeric ligatures were associated with moderately increased total bacterial load (3 studies; SMD = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.10 to 0.76; P = 0.03). Confidence in these estimates was low in all instances due to the inclusion of non-randomized studies with high risk of bias.

conclusionsExisting low quality evidence indicates that ligature method does not seem to influence the periodontal health during fixed treatment, even if elastomeric ligatures are associated with a moderate increase of bacterial load. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42023444383).

Indexed as

ElastomersOrthodontic Appliances, FixedHumansLigationOrthodontic BracketsPeriodontal IndexSteelElastomersSteelClinical trialsFixed appliancesMeta-analysisOrthodonticsPeriodontal indexStreptococcus mutansSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38880839
PMCPMC11180646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.