Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38880831›Full record

ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2024

Opinion, Use and Knowledge About Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Spain: A National Survey of Mental Health Professionals.

Pilar Sierra, Yolanda Cañada, Pilar Benavent, Ana Sabater, Josep Ribes, Lorenzo Livianos, Ana Garcia-Blanco

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Ethical Considerations in Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Neuromodulation for Disorders of Consciousness.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pilar SierraDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Building D. 106th Av Fernando Abril Martorell, Valencia, 46026, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6132-5608
Yolanda CañadaDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Building D. 106th Av Fernando Abril Martorell, Valencia, 46026, Spain. canyada_yol@gva.es.ORCID 0000-0001-5942-5044
Pilar BenaventDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Building D. 106th Av Fernando Abril Martorell, Valencia, 46026, Spain.
Ana SabaterDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Building D. 106th Av Fernando Abril Martorell, Valencia, 46026, Spain.
Josep RibesDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Building D. 106th Av Fernando Abril Martorell, Valencia, 46026, Spain.
Lorenzo LivianosDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Building D. 106th Av Fernando Abril Martorell, Valencia, 46026, Spain.
Ana Garcia-BlancoDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Building D. 106th Av Fernando Abril Martorell, Valencia, 46026, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7840-000X

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI22/00553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive method of neuromodulation with heterogeneous usage between countries, which may be potentially influenced by healthcare professionals' opinions. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, acceptability, and attitudes of mental health professionals in Spain towards TMS. A cross-sectional multicentric study was conducted using an online survey, with 219 participants including psychiatrists, psychologists, and residents. Nearly 100% of participants correctly answered theoretical aspects related to the rationale and indications of TMS. Although only 55% considered TMS effective, 80% would refer patients if TMS were available at their workplace, and 74% would undergo TMS if experiencing depression. 85% believed neuromodulation training should be increased in residency, and 73% demanded TMS inclusion in public hospitals. Teaching staff and psychologists defined TMS as a last resort (p = 0.03 and 0.045). Both disagreed on its ease of use (p < 0.001) and patient referral (p = 0.01), considering an impact on the therapeutic bond (p = 0.029). Previous TMS training, clinical experience, or availability of TMS at the workplace, were associated with better knowledge, a higher perception of efficacy and utility in treating resistant patients (all p < 0.05). In conclusion, surveyed mental health professionals in Spain demonstrated good knowledge of the technique and positive opinions regarding its utility. Findings emphasized limited clinical experience of the sample, a call for training programs, and the demand for the inclusion of TMS in the portfolio of Spanish public hospitals.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatryPsychologySpainSurveys and QuestionnairesAttitudesKnowledgeOpinionProfessionalsTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.