ArticleJournal of neurology2024
An MRI evaluation of white matter involvement in paradigmatic forms of spastic ataxia: results from the multi-center PROSPAX study.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disentangling pontine fiber geometry and microstructure in ARSACS using advanced MRI.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Article
- Hippocampal Volume Mediates the Association Between Serum Ferritin and Cognition in Non-Dialysis End-Stage Renal Disease Patients.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- The Cerebellar Cognitive-Affective Syndrome Scale Reveals Consistent, Early, and Progressive Neuropsychological Deficits in Autosomal-Recessive Spastic Ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay: A Large International Cross-Sectional Study.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Imaging Biomarkers Correlate with Progressive Motor Deficit in the Mouse Model of Charlevoix-Saguenay Ataxia.Annals of neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAutosomal Recessive Spastic Ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS) and Spastic Paraplegia Type 7 (SPG7) are paradigmatic spastic ataxias (SPAX) with suggested white matter (WM) involvement. Aim of this work was to thoroughly disentangle the degree of WM involvement in these conditions, evaluating both macrostructure and microstructure via the analysis of diffusion MRI (dMRI) data. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn this multi-center prospective study, ARSACS and SPG7 patients and Healthy Controls (HC) were enrolled, all undergoing a standardized dMRI protocol and a clinimetrics evaluation including the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA). Differences in terms of WM volume or global microstructural WM metrics were probed, as well as the possible occurrence of a spatially defined microstructural WM involvement via voxel-wise analyses, and its correlation with patients' clinical status.
resultsData of 37 ARSACS (M/F = 21/16; 33.4 ± 12.4 years), 37 SPG7 (M/F = 24/13; 55.7 ± 10.7 years), and 29 HC (M/F = 13/16; 42.1 ± 17.2 years) were analyzed. While in SPG7, only a mild mean microstructural damage was found compared to HC, ARSACS patients present a severe WM involvement, with a reduced global volume (p < 0.001), an alteration of all microstructural metrics (all with p < 0.001), without a spatially defined pattern of damage but with a prominent involvement of commissural fibers. Finally, in ARSACS, a correlation between microstructural damage and SARA scores was found (p = 0.004).
conclusionIn ARSACS, but not SPG7 patients, we observed a complex and multi-faced involvement of brain WM, with a clinically meaningful widespread loss of axonal and dendritic integrity, secondary demyelination and, overall, a reduction in cellularity and volume.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.