ArticleScientific reports2024
Multimodal deep learning for dementia classification using text and audio.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Multimodal AI for Alzheimer Disease Diagnosis: Systematic Review of Datasets, Models, and Modalities.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Natural language processing for geriatric syndromes: a systematic review of methods, applications, and challenges.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- A Representation Fusion Framework for Decoupling Diagnostic Information in Multimodal Learning.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- NeuroNet-AD: A Multimodal Deep Learning Framework for Multiclass Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deep ensemble learning with transformer models for enhanced Alzheimer's disease detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhanced Multi-Model Machine Learning-Based Dementia Detection Using a Data Enrichment Framework: Leveraging the Blessing of Dimensionality.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Obfuscation via pitch-shifting for balancing privacy and diagnostic utility in voice-based cognitive assessment.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- LLMCARE: early detection of cognitive impairment via transformer models enhanced by LLM-generated synthetic data.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Detecting CSF-validated Alzheimer's disease from spontaneous speech in German: an interpretable end-to-end machine-learning framework.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dementia is a progressive neurological disorder that affects the daily lives of older adults, impacting their verbal communication and cognitive function. Early diagnosis is important to enhance the lifespan and quality of life for affected individuals. Despite its importance, diagnosing dementia is a complex process. Automated machine learning solutions involving multiple types of data have the potential to improve the process of automated dementia screening. In this study, we build deep learning models to classify dementia cases from controls using the Pitt Cookie Theft dataset from DementiaBank, a database of short participant responses to the structured task of describing a picture of a cookie theft. We fine-tune Wav2vec and Word2vec baseline models to make binary predictions of dementia from audio recordings and text transcripts, respectively. We conduct experiments with four versions of the dataset: (1) the original data, (2) the data with short sentences removed, (3) text-based augmentation of the original data, and (4) text-based augmentation of the data with short sentences removed. Our results indicate that synonym-based text data augmentation generally enhances the performance of models that incorporate the text modality. Without data augmentation, models using the text modality achieve around 60% accuracy and 70% AUROC scores, and with data augmentation, the models achieve around 80% accuracy and 90% AUROC scores. We do not observe significant improvements in performance with the addition of audio or timestamp information into the model. We include a qualitative error analysis of the sentences that are misclassified under each study condition. This study provides preliminary insights into the effects of both text-based data augmentation and multimodal deep learning for automated dementia classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.