ArticlePediatric cardiology2025
Impaired Myocardial Work in Children with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Left Ventricular Fibrosis on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incorporating Ventricular Geometry into the Myocardial Work Index: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Significance of the Echocardiographic Assessment of Longitudinal Left Ventricular Systolic Function in Children and Adolescents with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Agreement Between Echocardiography and Cardiac MRI in Assessing Function, Strain, and Fibrosis in Pediatric Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Preliminary Study.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Characterisation of interrelations among myocardial work parameters in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: differences between non-obstructive and obstructive disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Echocardiography is pivotal for diagnosis and monitoring of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and can evaluate myocardial function using myocardial work (MW) calculations. Echocardiography is often supplemented by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, which can detect myocardial fibrosis using late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). We sought to study the relationship between baseline LGE and MW at baseline and during follow-up in pediatric HCM patients. During the study period (2008-2023), 75 patients were followed up for HCM. In 14 patients (age 14.2 ± 2.8 years, 50.0% male, 6.4 ± 2.9 years follow-up), both LGE-CMR and echocardiography were performed. Global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work, and global work efficiency (GWE) were measured, and myocardial fibrosis was estimated by qualitative assessment of LGE. Patients with LGE (n = 7) exhibited significantly impaired baseline MW, including GWI (mean difference, MD - 487.4 mmHg %, 95% CI [- 866.8 mmHg % to - 108.3 mmHg %], p = 0.027), GCW (MD - 536.8 mmHg %, 95% CI [- 929.8 mmHg % to - 144.4 mmHg %], p = 0.020), and GWE (MD - 4.4%, 95% CI [- 8.1% to - 0.7%], p = 0.039). Regional analysis revealed impaired MW indices in segments with LGE, notably basal and mid septal segments. GWI demonstrated high diagnostic performance for LGE presence (sensitivity 93%, specificity 88%, and area under receiver operating characteristic curve 0.85). Baseline LGE presence had no significant impact on MW deterioration during follow-up. MW is significantly impaired in HCM patients with myocardial fibrosis, highlighting potential utility of echocardiography-derived MW analysis as a valuable tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38880797What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.