Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38880695›Full record

ArticleVaccine2024

Genetically modified live vaccine offers protective immunity against wild-type Anaplasma marginale tick-transmission challenge.

Jonathan Ferm, Deborah C Jaworski, Ian Stoll, Michael D Kleinhenz, Katherine M Kocan, Swetha Madesh, Dominica Ferm, Huitao Liu, Shawna Fitzwater, Alexis Schlieper and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jonathan FermCenter of Excellence for Vector-Borne Diseases, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, United States; Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Deborah C JaworskiCenter of Excellence for Vector-Borne Diseases, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, United States.
Ian StollDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Michael D KleinhenzDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.
Katherine M KocanDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, United States.
Swetha MadeshCenter of Excellence for Vector-Borne Diseases, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, United States.
Dominica FermCenter of Excellence for Vector-Borne Diseases, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, United States.
Huitao LiuCenter of Excellence for Vector-Borne Diseases, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, United States; Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Shawna FitzwaterCenter of Excellence for Vector-Borne Diseases, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, United States.
Alexis SchlieperCenter of Excellence for Vector-Borne Diseases, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, United States.
Roman R GantaCenter of Excellence for Vector-Borne Diseases, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, United States; Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States. Electronic address: romanganta@missouri.edu.

Funding

Vector and Host Contributions to the Regulation of E. Chaffeensis Gene ExpressionR01AI070908 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI ROMAN R. GANTA · 2008 to 2026
$6.9M
Vaccines Against Ehrlichia and Anaplasma Species InfectionsR01AI152418 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI GANTA, ROMAN R. · 2020 to 2024
$3.1M
Vector and Host Contributions to the Regulation of E. chaffeensis Gene ExpressionR56AI070908 · NIAID · KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GANTA, ROMAN R. · 2013 to 2013
$426k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI070908NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI152418NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI070908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaplasma marginale is a tick-borne pathogen of cattle that causes bovine anaplasmosis in tropical and subtropical regions throughout the world. Killed vaccines derived from infected erythrocytes have been used for control of this disease with limited success. Recently, we described a targeted deletion mutation in the phage head-to-tail connector protein gene of A. marginale which caused bacterial attenuation in vivo and provided protection as a modified live vaccine (MLAV). Following intravenous injection of susceptible steers, the MLAV induced protective immunity against disease progression. In the current study, we demonstrated that the immunity resulting from MLAV in cattle prevents the disease progression resulting from virulent A. marginale intrastadial transmission from infected Dermacentor variabilis male ticks. The nonimmunized control steers receiving the infection from ticks developed fever, lethargy, and inappetence for several days post tick exposure with significant decreases in the packed cell volume and increases in bacteremia. In contrast, the MLAV immunized steers remained healthy after being challenged with infected ticks and this group of animals had a significant reduction in bacteremia as compared with the controls. This study demonstrated that the A. marginale MLAV provided protection against acute tick-transmitted anaplasmosis, in addition to protection documented in steers challenge-exposed with infected blood as reported previously.

Indexed as

Anaplasma marginaleAnaplasmosisBacterial VaccinesCattle DiseasesVaccines, AttenuatedAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialCattleDermacentorMaleAntibodies, BacterialBacterial VaccinesVaccines, Attenuated

Identifiers

PMID38880695
PMCPMC11401762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.