Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38880284›Full record

Trial reportAppetite2024

Examining the effects of brand and licensed characters on parents' perceptions of Children's breakfast cereals.

Phoebe R Ruggles, Lindsey Smith Taillie, Cristina J Y Lee, Carmen E Prestemon, Emily W Duffy, Carlos F U Rojas, Marissa G Hall

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Appetite, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Phoebe R RugglesDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
Lindsey Smith TaillieDepartment of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA; Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel, USA.
Cristina J Y LeeDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, USA.
Carmen E PrestemonCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel, USA.
Emily W DuffyDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
Carlos F U RojasDepartment of Design, University of Joinville Region, Brazil; Laboratory of Information Design Systems (LabDSI), Federal University of Paraná, Brazil.
Marissa G HallDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA; Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA. Electronic address: mghall@unc.edu.

Funding

POPULATION STUDIEST32HD007168 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ELIZABETH A FRANKENBERG · 1985 to 2026
$13.8M
Cancer Control Education ProgramT32CA057726 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa B Gilkey, Melissa A. Troester · 2017 to 2026
$3.7M
Cancer Health Disparities Training ProgramT32CA128582 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ENG, EUGENIA, TATE, DEBORAH F. · 2009 to 2023
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA057726NCI NIH HHS T32 CA128582NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brand and licensed characters frequently appear on children's breakfast cereal boxes and are known to affect children's product perceptions, selection, and consumption. However, less is known about their impact on parents' perceptions of foods they purchase for their child. The present study assessed the impact of brand and licensed characters featured on three children's breakfast cereal packages on parents' intentions and perceptions in an online experiment. Parents of children aged 2-12 years (n = 1013) were randomized into one of two conditions: breakfast cereals containing brand and licensed characters or breakfast cereals without any characters. Within each condition, participants viewed three breakfast cereal brands in random order per their assigned condition and reported their purchase intentions, healthfulness perceptions, and perceptions of appeal to children using 5-point Likert scales. No significant differences in purchase intentions (p = 0.91), perceived healthfulness (p = 0.52) or perceived child appeal (p = 0.59) were observed between the experimental and control groups. However, exploratory moderation analyses revealed that educational attainment moderated the impact of experimental condition on purchase intentions (p for interaction = 0.002) such that participants with a bachelor's degree in the character condition reported 0.36 points lower purchase intentions compared to the control with no difference between conditions for those with an associate's degree/trade school or high school degree or less. This study did not find an impact of brand and licensed characters on children's breakfast cereals, suggesting that their primary appeal is directly to children. Parents with higher educational attainment may be skeptical of characters on cereal brands. Additional research on the impact of brand and licensed characters on other products, in real-world settings, is needed.

Indexed as

BreakfastConsumer BehaviorEdible GrainFood PreferencesIntentionParentsAdultAdvertisingChildChild, PreschoolChoice BehaviorEducational StatusFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleBrand charactersCerealChild-directed marketingLicensed charactersParent perceptionsUltraprocessed food

Identifiers

PMID38880284
PMCPMC11328928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.