ArticleMultiple sclerosis and related disorders2024
Perspectives on fatigue management among veterans living with multiple sclerosis.
Article in Multiple sclerosis and related disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic fatigue is one of the most common, disabling, and least understood symptoms of many chronic health conditions including multiple sclerosis (MS). A multidisciplinary rehabilitative treatment approach is recommended for MS-related fatigue, but few people with MS have access to such treatment. In-person and telehealth cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for fatigue is an emerging acceptable and effective treatment for MS-related fatigue in civilians that has not been studied in Veterans with MS, a population that is more likely to be older, male, unemployed, and disabled. The present study aimed to understand how Veterans with MS (1) describe their fatigue and (2) manage their fatigue, and (3) perceive telehealth CBT for MS-related fatigue.
methodTwenty-four Veterans with MS completed semi-structured interviews and a brief survey. For descriptive purposes, the survey included questionnaires on demographics, fatigue, psychosocial functioning, depression, and pain. Thematic analysis with a combined deductive and inductive approach was used to analyze interview transcripts.
resultsThree themes emerged. First, "experience of MS fatigue as 'one big tapestry'" described fatigue as deficits in physical and mental energy that were fluctuating and complex in their interaction with biological factors. Veterans described that MS fatigue negatively impacted daily activities of living, emotions, and cognitive functioning. Second, "managing MS fatigue through trial and error" revealed that Veterans expend significant time and effort learning and trialing fatigue management strategies based on their personal beliefs, military training/experiences, provider recommendations, and iterative learning. Most Veterans described energy management, relaxation, exercise, and adaptive thinking as helpful for managing fatigue. Interestingly, the helpfulness of medication for fatigue was highly variable, and none of the Veterans described medication as a standalone fatigue treatment. The third theme, "practicing flexibility with telehealth CBT for MS fatigue" revealed Veteran's enthusiasm about telehealth CBT for MS-related fatigue and highlighted the importance of flexible delivery to meet individual needs.
conclusionVeteran participants shared their experience of MS-related fatigue as well as management strategies that are consistent with previous research in civilians with MS fatigue. Notably, Veterans' preference for flexible nonpharmacological intervention can inform adaptation of telehealth CBT for Veterans with MS fatigue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.