ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2024
Reconstructive techniques for radiation-induced hemifacial sequelae: A hemangioma case study.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and importanceThe use of radiation therapy for infantile hemangiomas 30 years ago has led to severe consequences in adulthood. CASE PRESENTATION: This article shares the experience of using multiple reconstructive procedures to treat radiation-induced hemifacial sequelae for capillary malformations. Based on the damaged anatomical surgical units, appropriate reconstructive materials are used for the surgery. Thin antero-lateral thigh (ALT) flaps cover lesions on the forehead and cheeks, while a skin expander covers the temporal scalp lesion. Autologous grafting covers damage in both eyelids. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Choosing a suitable reconstructive material will provide aesthetic outcomes such as facial symmetry, skin color compatibility, and textural similarity in the constructive areas for the patient. The patients were highly satisfied with the surgical results.
conclusionUsing appropriate surgical techniques and materials, along with meticulous attention to facial integrity, can achieve optimal aesthetic and functional outcomes in patients with severe facial disfigurement from radiation therapy. A thorough understanding of pathophysiology and anatomy, along with skillful execution, can result in a successful outcome and improved quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.