Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38879844›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024

BrainLossNet: a fast, accurate and robust method to estimate brain volume loss from longitudinal MRI.

Roland Opfer, Julia Krüger, Thomas Buddenkotte, Lothar Spies, Finn Behrendt, Sven Schippling, Ralph Buchert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Roland OpferJung Diagnostics GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9911-5478
Julia KrügerJung Diagnostics GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
Thomas BuddenkotteDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Lothar SpiesJung Diagnostics GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
Finn BehrendtInstitute of Medical Technology and Intelligent Systems, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany.
Sven SchipplingMultimodal Imaging in Neuroimmunological Diseases (MINDS), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ralph BuchertDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. r.buchert@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0945-0724

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMRI-derived brain volume loss (BVL) is widely used as neurodegeneration marker. SIENA is state-of-the-art for BVL measurement, but limited by long computation time. Here we propose "BrainLossNet", a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based method for BVL-estimation.

methodsBrainLossNet uses CNN-based non-linear registration of baseline(BL)/follow-up(FU) 3D-T1w-MRI pairs. BVL is computed by non-linear registration of brain parenchyma masks segmented in the BL/FU scans. The BVL estimate is corrected for image distortions using the apparent volume change of the total intracranial volume. BrainLossNet was trained on 1525 BL/FU pairs from 83 scanners. Agreement between BrainLossNet and SIENA was assessed in 225 BL/FU pairs from 94 MS patients acquired with a single scanner and 268 BL/FU pairs from 52 scanners acquired for various indications. Robustness to short-term variability of 3D-T1w-MRI was compared in 354 BL/FU pairs from a single healthy men acquired in the same session without repositioning with 116 scanners (Frequently-Traveling-Human-Phantom dataset, FTHP).

resultsProcessing time of BrainLossNet was 2-3 min. The median [interquartile range] of the SIENA-BrainLossNet BVL difference was 0.10% [- 0.18%, 0.35%] in the MS dataset, 0.08% [- 0.14%, 0.28%] in the various indications dataset. The distribution of apparent BVL in the FTHP dataset was narrower with BrainLossNet (p = 0.036; 95th percentile: 0.20% vs 0.32%).

conclusionBrainLossNet on average provides the same BVL estimates as SIENA, but it is significantly more robust, probably due to its built-in distortion correction. Processing time of 2-3 min makes BrainLossNet suitable for clinical routine. This can pave the way for widespread clinical use of BVL estimation from intra-scanner BL/FU pairs.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerAdultFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedOrgan SizeBrain volume lossConvolutional neural networkMagnetic resonance imagingMultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID38879844
PMCPMC11365843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.