Laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for T4a gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of long-term outcomes.

Evidence of implementation of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for surgical T4a stage (sT4a) gastric cancer (GC) remains inadequate. This study aimed to compare short- and long-term outcomes of LTG versus open total gastrectomy (OTG) for sT4a GC. This retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from patients with sT4a GC underwent total gastrectomy from 2014 to 2020. Short-term outcomes included operative characteristics and postoperative complications. Long-term oncological outcomes focused on 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to reduce potential biases in baseline characteristics between groups. There was a total of 161 patients, in which 96 underwent LTG and 65 underwent OTG. After PSM, both groups consisted of 51 patients each, with balanced baseline characteristics. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding blood loss, length of proximal resected margin, postoperative hospital stays, and overall and major postoperative complications. Most of the complications were classified as minor according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Operating time was significantly longer in the LTG group (mean: 257 min vs. 231 min, p = 0.006). LTG was superior to OTG groups in time to flatus (mean: 3.0 days vs 3.9 days, p < 0.001). Five-year OS and DFS rates were similar between the two groups (44% and 33% vs. 43% and 28% in the LTG and OTG groups, respectively). Our findings indicate that LTG is a feasible and safe technique, exhibiting comparable long-term oncological outcomes to OTG for sT4a GC. LTG may be an acceptable alternative to OTG for the treatment of sT4a GC.