Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38879812›Full record

ReviewCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2024

Therapy-induced senescence is finally escapable, what is next?

Tareq Saleh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tareq SalehDepartment of Pharmacology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0002-2878-1107

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several breakthrough articles have recently confirmed the ability of tumor cells to escape the stable cell cycle arrest imposed by Therapy-Induced Senescence (TIS). Subsequently, accepting the hypothesis that TIS is escapable should encourage serious reassessments of the fundamental roles of senescence in cancer treatment. The potential for escape from TIS undermines the well-established tumor suppressor function of senescence, proposes it as a mechanism of tumor dormancy leading to disease recurrence and invites for further investigation of its unfavorable contribution to cancer therapy outcomes. Moreover, escaping TIS strongly indicates that the elimination of senescent tumor cells, primarily through pharmacological means, is a suitable approach for increasing the efficacy of cancer treatment, one that still requires further exploration. This commentary provides an overview of the recent evidence that unequivocally demonstrated the ability of therapy-induced senescent tumor cells in overcoming the terminal growth arrest fate and provides future perspectives on the roles of TIS in tumor biology.

Indexed as

Cellular SenescenceNeoplasmsAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell Cycle CheckpointsHumansAntineoplastic AgentscancerdormancyescapereversibleSenescencesenolytic

Identifiers

PMID38879812
PMCPMC11229739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.