Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38879722›Full record

SynthesisPrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2024

Universal Child Mental Health Screening for Parents: a Systematic Review of the Evidence.

Shona K Brinley, Lucy A Tully, Talia Carl, Rebecca K McLean, Caitlin S M Cowan, David J Hawes, Mark R Dadds, Jaimie C Northam

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shona K BrinleyThe School of Psychology, The Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. shona.brinley@anu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-8251-685X
Lucy A TullyThe School of Psychology, The Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Talia CarlThe School of Psychology, The Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4744-5536
Rebecca K McLeanThe School of Psychology, The Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2691-8499
Caitlin S M CowanThe School of Psychology, The Faculty of Science, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2959-1380
David J HawesThe School of Psychology, The Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3260-1225
Mark R DaddsThe School of Psychology, The Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jaimie C NorthamThe School of Psychology, The Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

Medical Research Future Fund MRF2006438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Childhood represents a critical window for the emergence and treatment of mental health disorders, yet many are not being identified, or are identified too late to receive adequate intervention. This systematic review (Prospero registration: CRD42022299560) aimed to determine the effectiveness and acceptability of parent reported universal mental health screening (UMHS) to improve the early identification of children at-risk of mental health difficulties, and to identify barriers and enablers that may influence parental engagement. Six databases were searched in February 2022 for peer-reviewed, primary research. Studies conducted in targeted populations, evaluating psychometric properties, or focused on screening non-psychological problems were excluded. Ten studies examined parent reported (n = 3,464 parents) UMHS for children from birth to 18 years, suggesting an overall scarcity of research. Findings are presented in a table of study characteristics and a narrative summary of acceptability, effectiveness, barriers, and enablers. Quantitative findings indicated that parents generally support and accept UMHS. Research assessing effectiveness was limited, although two studies indicated increased referrals and referral adherence following positive screens. Confidentiality and stigma were commonly identified barriers. Quality assessment using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool indicated that studies varied in quality, meeting four to seven of the seven quality criteria. Understanding and addressing parent attitudes to UMHS across settings is necessary for the successful implementation of screening and improvement of child mental health outcomes. More high-quality research studies, including randomized controlled trials are therefore needed to examine the acceptability and effectiveness of UMHS for parents and their children.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningMental DisordersAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansMental HealthParentsAcceptabilityChild mental healthEffectivenessParent-reportUniversal screening

Identifiers

PMID38879722
PMCPMC11322249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.