Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38879671›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2024

Open versus Minimally Invasive Nephroureterectomy: Contemporary Analysis from a Wide National Population-Based Database.

Antonio Franco, Francesco Ditonno, Celeste Manfredi, Morgan R Sturgis, Eugenio Bologna, Leslie Claire Licari, Carol L Feng, Cosimo De Nunzio, Alessandro Antonelli, Marco De Sio and 6 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Antonio FrancoDepartment of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Francesco DitonnoDepartment of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Celeste ManfrediDepartment of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Morgan R SturgisDepartment of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Eugenio BolognaDepartment of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Leslie Claire LicariDepartment of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Carol L FengDepartment of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Cosimo De NunzioDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Alessandro AntonelliDepartment of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Marco De SioUrology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, "Luigi Vanvitelli" University, Naples, Italy.
Costantino LeonardoDepartment of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Hooman DjaladatNorris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Srinivas VourgantiDepartment of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Edward E CherulloDepartment of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ephrem OlwenyDepartment of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Riccardo AutorinoDepartment of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA. ricautor@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is generally perceived that minimally invasive nephroureterectomy (MINU), especially in the form of robotic-assisted laparoscopy, is gaining an increasing role in many institutions.

objectiveThe aim of our study was to investigate contemporary trends in the adoption of MINU in the United States compared with open nephroureterectomy (ONU).

methodsPatients who underwent ONU or MINU between 2011 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed using PearlDiver Mariner, an all-payer insurance claims database. International Classification of Diseases diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify the type of surgical procedure, patients' characteristics, social determinants of health (SDOH), and perioperative complications. The primary objective assessed different trends and costs in NU adoption, while secondary objectives analyzed factors influencing the postoperative complications, including SDOH. Outcomes were compared using multivariable regression models.

resultsOverall, 15,240 patients underwent ONU (n = 7675) and MINU (n = 7565). Utilization of ONU declined over the study period, whereas that of MINU increased from 29 to 72% (p = 0.01). The 60-day postoperative complication rate was 23% for ONU and 19% for MINU (p < 0.001). At multivariable analysis, ONU showed a significantly higher risk of postoperative complications (odds ratio 1.33, 95% CI 1.20-1.48). Approximately 5% and 9% of patients reported at least one SDOH at baseline for both ONU and MINU (p < 0.001).

conclusionsContemporary trend analysis of a large national dataset confirms that there has been a significant shift towards MINU, which is gradually replacing ONU. A minimally invasive approach is associated with lower risk of complications. SDOH are non-clinical factors that currently do not have an impact on the outcomes of nephroureterectomy.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresNephroureterectomyPostoperative ComplicationsAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKidney NeoplasmsLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRobotic Surgical ProceduresUnited StatesMinimally invasive surgeryNephrectomyNephroureterectomyTrendsUTUC

Identifiers

PMID38879671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.