ArticleNature communications2024
Hebbian priming of human motor learning.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel Time-Series Forecasting Method to Enhance Accuracy of Real-Time EEG Detection for BCI-Based Neurofeedback Motor Training in Individuals with Cerebral Palsy and Other Neurological Disorders.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Harnessing Neuroplasticity: The Role of Priming in Enhancing Post Stroke Motor Function.Restorative neurology and neuroscience · 2026Review
- Plasticity reloaded: motor skill learning plus stimulation boosts adaptations in the ageing nervous system.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- Comparative efficacy and mechanistic insights of non-invasive neuromodulation and motor rehabilitation on functional reorganization of the supplementary motor area in subacute stroke: a narrative review.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Lateralized excitation-inhibition rebalance correlates with motor recovery following hemispheric surgery.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation enhances ballistic motor learning and corticospinal plasticity in older adults.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- Dynamic reconfiguration of brain coactivation states associated with active and lecture-based learning of university physics.NPJ science of learning · 2025Article
- Microstructural integrity within the damaged region of the residual corticofugal projection from primary motor cortex predicts the effect of noninvasive neuromodulation targeting the spinal cord in chronic stroke.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Article
- Hebbian priming of human motor learning.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Effects of noninvasive neuromodulation targeting the spinal cord on early learning of force control by the digits.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motor learning relies on experience-dependent plasticity in relevant neural circuits. In four experiments, we provide initial evidence and a double-blinded, sham-controlled replication (Experiment I-II) demonstrating that motor learning involving ballistic index finger movements is improved by preceding paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation (PCMS), a human model for exogenous induction of spike-timing-dependent plasticity. Behavioral effects of PCMS targeting corticomotoneuronal (CM) synapses are order- and timing-specific and partially bidirectional (Experiment III). PCMS with a 2 ms inter-arrival interval at CM-synapses enhances learning and increases corticospinal excitability compared to control protocols. Unpaired stimulations did not increase corticospinal excitability (Experiment IV). Our findings demonstrate that non-invasively induced plasticity interacts positively with experience-dependent plasticity to promote motor learning. The effects of PCMS on motor learning approximate Hebbian learning rules, while the effects on corticospinal excitability demonstrate timing-specificity but not bidirectionality. These findings offer a mechanistic rationale to enhance motor practice effects by priming sensorimotor training with individualized PCMS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.