Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38879555›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2024

Baricitinib ameliorates inflammatory and neuropathic pain in collagen antibody-induced arthritis mice by modulating the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 pathway and CSF-1 expression in dorsal root ganglion neurons.

Kenta Makabe, Hiroyuki Okada, Naohiro Tachibana, Hisatoshi Ishikura, Norihito Ito, Masaru Tanaka, Ryota Chijimatsu, Asuka Terashima, Fumiko Yano, Meiko Asaka and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Evaluation of metformin's effect on 5-fluorouracil-induced cardiotoxicity through cellular protection.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Kenta MakabeSensory and Motor System Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Hiroyuki OkadaSensory and Motor System Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Naohiro TachibanaSensory and Motor System Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Hisatoshi IshikuraSensory and Motor System Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Norihito ItoJapan Drug Development and Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K, 5-1-28 Isogami-Dori, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, 651-0086, Japan.
Masaru TanakaJapan Drug Development and Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K, 5-1-28 Isogami-Dori, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, 651-0086, Japan.
Ryota ChijimatsuBone and Cartilage Regenerative Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Asuka TerashimaBone and Cartilage Regenerative Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Fumiko YanoBone and Cartilage Regenerative Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Meiko AsakaDepartment of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 3-8-1 Komaba, Meguro-Ku, Tokyo, 153-8902, Japan.
Dai YanagiharaDepartment of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 3-8-1 Komaba, Meguro-Ku, Tokyo, 153-8902, Japan.
Shuji TaketomiSensory and Motor System Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Takumi MatsumotoSensory and Motor System Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Sakae TanakaSensory and Motor System Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Yasunori OmataSensory and Motor System Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Taku SaitoSensory and Motor System Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan. tasaitou-tky@umin.ac.jp.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 21K09294 and 19H05654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundJanus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, such as baricitinib, are widely used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Clinical studies show that baricitinib is more effective at reducing pain than other similar drugs. Here, we aimed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the pain relief conferred by baricitinib, using a mouse model of arthritis.

methodsWe treated collagen antibody-induced arthritis (CAIA) model mice with baricitinib, celecoxib, or vehicle, and evaluated the severity of arthritis, histological findings of the spinal cord, and pain-related behaviours. We also conducted RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to identify alterations in gene expression in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) following baricitinib treatment. Finally, we conducted in vitro experiments to investigate the direct effects of baricitinib on neuronal cells.

resultsBoth baricitinib and celecoxib significantly decreased CAIA and improved arthritis-dependent grip-strength deficit, while only baricitinib notably suppressed residual tactile allodynia as determined by the von Frey test. CAIA induction of inflammatory cytokines in ankle synovium, including interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-6, was suppressed by treatment with either baricitinib or celecoxib. In contrast, RNA-seq analysis of the DRG revealed that baricitinib, but not celecoxib, restored gene expression alterations induced by CAIA to the control condition. Among many pathways changed by CAIA and baricitinib treatment, the interferon-alpha/gamma, JAK-signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) pathways were considerably decreased in the baricitinib group compared with the celecoxib group. Notably, only baricitinib decreased the expression of colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1), a potent cytokine that causes neuropathic pain through activation of the microglia-astrocyte axis in the spinal cord. Accordingly, baricitinib prevented increases in microglia and astrocytes caused by CAIA. Baricitinib also suppressed JAK/STAT3 pathway activity and Csf1 expression in cultured neuronal cells.

conclusionsOur findings demonstrate the effects baricitinib has on the DRG in relation to ameliorating both inflammatory and neuropathic pain.

Indexed as

Arthritis, ExperimentalGanglia, SpinalInterleukin-6NeuralgiaSignal TransductionSTAT3 Transcription FactorAnimalsAzetidinesJanus Kinase InhibitorsMaleMiceMice, Inbred DBANeuronsPurinesPyrazolesSulfonamidesAzetidinesbaricitinibInterleukin-6Janus Kinase InhibitorsPurinesPyrazolesStat3 protein, mouseSTAT3 Transcription FactorSulfonamidesBaricitinibCAIA modelJAK/STAT3 pathwayPain-related behaviourRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID38879555
PMCPMC11179219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.