SynthesisBMC cancer2024
The association between XPD rs13181 and rs1799793 polymorphism and oral cancer risk: evidence from a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSingle nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are common in genes and can lead to dysregulation of gene expression in tissues, which can affect carcinogenesis. Many studies reporting the association between xeroderma pigmentosum group D (XPD) polymorphisms of rs13181 and rs1799793 with oral cancer risk, but with conflicting and inconclusive results.
methodsWe performed a comprehensive and systematic search through the PubMed, Elsevier, Web of science, and Embase databases, twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis to determine whether XPD rs13181 and rs1799793 polymorphism contributed to the risk of oral cancer.
resultsThe pooled date indicated a significant association between the rs13181 polymorphism and oral cancer risk for the allele comparison model (odds ratio, OR = 1.60, 95% confidence intervals, CI = 1.09-2.35, P = 0.02), the dominant model (OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.08-2.82, P = 0.02), and the heterozygote model (OR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.02-2.49, P = 0.04). For the XPD rs1799793 polymorphism, it is not associated with the incidence of oral cancer under any model. Subgroup analyses based on ethnicity indicated that the rs13181 polymorphism increased the risk of oral cancer among Asians according to the allele comparison model (OR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.10-3.51, P = 0.02), the dominant model (OR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.25-4.44, P = 0.008), the heterozygote model (OR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.15-3.66, P = 0.01), and the homozygous model (OR = 2.47, 95% CI = 1.06-5.76, P = 0.04).
conclusionOur meta-analysis suggests a positive correlation between XPD rs13181polymorphism and the development of oral cancer among Asians, but a negative correlation among Caucasians populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.