Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38879489›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2024

Interventions that have potential to help older adults living with social frailty: a systematic scoping review.

Monika Kastner, Isabella Herrington, Julie Makarski, Krystle Amog, Tejia Bain, Vianca Evangelista, Leigh Hayden, Alexa Gruber, Justin Sutherland, Amy Sirkin and 18 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Mapping Caregiver Needs' Assessment Tools for Family and Friend Caregivers: A Rapid Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Monika KastnerNorth York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. monika.kastner@utoronto.ca.
Isabella HerringtonNorth York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Julie MakarskiNorth York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Krystle AmogInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tejia BainNorth York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Vianca EvangelistaNorth York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Leigh HaydenNorth York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alexa GruberNorth York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Justin SutherlandNorth York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Amy SirkinNorth York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Laure PerrierInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ian D GrahamUniversity of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Michelle GreiverNorth York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Joan HonsbergerNorth York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mary HynesNorth York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Charlie MacfarlaneNorth York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Leela PrasaudNorth York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Barbara SklarNorth York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Margo TwohigNorth York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Barbara LiuSunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sarah MunceInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sharon MarrDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Braden O'NeillSt. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alexandra PapaioannouDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Bianca SeatonNorth York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sharon E StrausSt. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Katie DaintyNorth York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jayna Holroyd-LeducUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 172657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of social frailty on older adults is profound including mortality risk, functional decline, falls, and disability. However, effective strategies that respond to the needs of socially frail older adults are lacking and few studies have unpacked how social determinants operate or how interventions can be adapted during periods requiring social distancing and isolation such as the COVID-19 pandemic. To address these gaps, we conducted a scoping review using JBI methodology to identify interventions that have the best potential to help socially frail older adults (age ≥65 years).

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, CINAHL (EPSCO), EMBASE and COVID-19 databases and the grey literature. Eligibility criteria were developed using the PICOS framework. Our results were summarized descriptively according to study, patient, intervention and outcome characteristics. Data synthesis involved charting and categorizing identified interventions using a social frailty framework. 

resultsOf 263 included studies, we identified 495 interventions involving ~124,498 older adults who were mostly female. The largest proportion of older adults (40.5%) had a mean age range of 70-79 years. The 495 interventions were spread across four social frailty domains: social resource (40%), self-management (32%), social behavioural activity (28%), and general resource (0.4%). Of these, 189 interventions were effective for improving loneliness, social and health and wellbeing outcomes across psychological self-management, self-management education, leisure activity, physical activity, Information Communication Technology and socially assistive robot interventions. Sixty-three interventions were identified as feasible to be adapted during infectious disease outbreaks (e.g., COVID-19, flu) to help socially frail older adults.

conclusionsOur scoping review identified promising interventions with the best potential to help older adults living with social frailty.

Indexed as

COVID-19Frail ElderlyAgedAged, 80 and overFrailtyHumansSARS-CoV-2Social IsolationGeriatricsInformation communication technologyOlder adultsScoping reviewSelf-managementSocial frailty

Identifiers

PMID38879489
PMCPMC11179268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.