ArticleThe American journal of pathology2024
Deep Learning for Grading Endometrial Cancer.
Article in The American journal of pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating artificial intelligence and multi-omics data for precision oncology in endometrial cancer: a narrative review.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
- Precision oncology in gynecologic cancers: molecular taxonomy, biomarker-guided therapeutics, and the challenge of therapeutic resistance.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Histopathology Images-Based Deep Learning Prediction of Histological Types in Endometrial Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Navigating the future of fertility preservation: advanced predictive strategies for treatment outcomes of endometrial atypical hyperplasia and carcinoma.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2025Review
- Deep learning for digital pathology: A critical overview of methodological framework.Journal of pathology informatics · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence Tools for Supporting Histopathologic and Molecular Characterization of Gynecological Cancers: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Endometrial cancer: from clinical reality to molecular treatment.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Review
- MMRNet: Ensemble deep learning models for predicting mismatch repair deficiency in endometrial cancer from histopathological images.Cell reports. Medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Hybrid ResNet-ViT Framework for Endometrial Lesion Analysis: A Comparative Study of MRI and CT in Endometrial Cancer Classification.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- A multi-model approach integrating whole-slide imaging and clinicopathologic features to predict breast cancer recurrence risk.NPJ breast cancer · 2024Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in gynecologic cancers: A bibliometric analysis.Digital healthArticle
- Enhancing clinical decision-making in endometrial cancer through deep learning technology: A review of current research.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women in the United States, with a lifetime risk of approximately 2.8%. Precise histologic evaluation and molecular classification of endometrial cancer are important for effective patient management and determining the best treatment options. This study introduces EndoNet, which uses convolutional neural networks for extracting histologic features and a vision transformer for aggregating these features and classifying slides into high- and low-grade cases. The model was trained on 929 digitized hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole-slide images of endometrial cancer from hysterectomy cases at Dartmouth-Health. It classifies these slides into low-grade (endometrioid grades 1 and 2) and high-grade (endometrioid carcinoma International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics grade 3, uterine serous carcinoma, or carcinosarcoma) categories. EndoNet was evaluated on an internal test set of 110 patients and an external test set of 100 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. The model achieved a weighted average F1 score of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.86 to 0.95) and an area under the curve of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.89 to 0.99) on the internal test, and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.80 to 0.94) for F1 score and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.93) for area under the curve on the external test. Pending further validation, EndoNet has the potential to support pathologists without the need of manual annotations in classifying the grades of gynecologic pathology tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.