Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38879079›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of pathology2024

Deep Learning for Grading Endometrial Cancer.

Manu Goyal, Laura J Tafe, James X Feng, Kristen E Muller, Liesbeth Hondelink, Jessica L Bentz, Saeed Hassanpour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Manu GoyalDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire. Electronic address: manu.goyal@dartmouth.edu.
Laura J TafeDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
James X FengGeisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Kristen E MullerDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Liesbeth HondelinkDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Jessica L BentzDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Saeed HassanpourDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Fred W Kolling IV · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Advancing Digital Pathology through Novel Machine Learning MethodologiesR01LM013833 · NLM · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Saeed Hassanpour · 2022 to 2026
$3.0M
Clinicopathologic and Genetic Profiling through Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing for Precision Lung Cancer ManagementR01CA249758 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI HASSANPOUR, SAEED · 2019 to 2022
$1.5M
Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening and Risk Assessment through Deep Learning on Medical Images and RecordsR01LM012837 · NLM · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI HASSANPOUR, SAEED · 2019 to 2022
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NCI NIH HHS R01 CA249758NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012837NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women in the United States, with a lifetime risk of approximately 2.8%. Precise histologic evaluation and molecular classification of endometrial cancer are important for effective patient management and determining the best treatment options. This study introduces EndoNet, which uses convolutional neural networks for extracting histologic features and a vision transformer for aggregating these features and classifying slides into high- and low-grade cases. The model was trained on 929 digitized hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole-slide images of endometrial cancer from hysterectomy cases at Dartmouth-Health. It classifies these slides into low-grade (endometrioid grades 1 and 2) and high-grade (endometrioid carcinoma International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics grade 3, uterine serous carcinoma, or carcinosarcoma) categories. EndoNet was evaluated on an internal test set of 110 patients and an external test set of 100 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. The model achieved a weighted average F1 score of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.86 to 0.95) and an area under the curve of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.89 to 0.99) on the internal test, and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.80 to 0.94) for F1 score and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.93) for area under the curve on the external test. Pending further validation, EndoNet has the potential to support pathologists without the need of manual annotations in classifying the grades of gynecologic pathology tumors.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEndometrial NeoplasmsNeoplasm GradingFemaleHumansNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID38879079
PMCPMC11373039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.