Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38878895›Full record

ArticleWorld neurosurgery2024

Use of an Irrigating External Ventricular Drain in an Infant: Proof-Of-Concept Technical Note.

Kimberly Hamilton, Nick Brandmeir, P David Adelson

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in World neurosurgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kimberly HamiltonNeurosurgery Department, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA. Electronic address: drkimberlyhamilton@gmail.com.
Nick BrandmeirNeurosurgery Department, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
P David AdelsonNeurosurgery Department, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Laura F. Gibson · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis report describes the procedural nuances for use of an irrigating external ventricular drain (EVD) in an infant patient. Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and other intraventricular pathologies, such as infection, can occur in a variety of situations and patient populations, with few interventions available for immediate resolution. While manual endoscopic surgical irrigation has been trialed in both adult and pediatric patient populations to clear blood products or debris, this concept has recently been further extrapolated to the use of a continuous irrigating EVD over a more extended period. While this technique has been more commonly used for subarachnoid hemorrhage in adults, study of its use in pediatric patients, particularly in infants, is lacking.

methodsIn this single case technical note of proof of feasibility, a continuous irrigating EVD was used in an infant to help clear an iatrogenic IVH.

resultsUtilization of an irrigating EVD was successfully completed in a 9 kg infant without associated complications. Clearance of IVH was noted after 9 days of irrigation.

conclusionsUse of irrigating EVD catheters should not be limited to the adult population. Indications for use are broad in the pediatric population and warrant further exploration.

Indexed as

DrainageTherapeutic IrrigationCerebral Intraventricular HemorrhageFemaleHumansInfantMaleProof of Concept StudyVentriculostomyIntraventricular hemorrhageIrrigating external ventricular drainNeuroendoscopic lavagePosthemorrhagic hydrocephalus

Identifiers

PMID38878895
PMCPMC11451260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.