ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2024
Big bladder stone accompanied by big posterior urethral stone: A management of rare case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Misdiagnosed large bladder stone after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and literature review: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and importanceUrinary tract stones are a common disease, but concurrent large-size stones in the bladder and urethra are rare. This phenomenon can lead to obstruction, infection, and other complications. We reported the management of a rare case of a giant bladder stone accompanied by a big posterior urethral stone. CASE PRESENTATION: A 36-year-old man with a chief complaint of not being able to have spontaneous micturition, frequent expulsion of stones from the penis, and a history of hematuria. Bladder examination revealed a giant bladder stone of 1278 Hounsfield Unit (HU) with a size of 4.1 × 7.2 cm, and urethral examination revealed a stone of 1275 Hounsfield Unit (HU) with a length of 4.3 × 4.2 cm, without mass. This patient underwent vesicolithotomy and urethrotomy. The evaluation showed spontaneous micturition and dissolved hydronephrosis. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Urinary tract stone management primarily involves endourology or open surgery. For smaller stones (<5-6 mm), medication is sufficient, as they often pass spontaneously. Larger stones may require interventions like vesicolithotomy or urethrotomy. Vesicolithotomy is preferred for complex or large bladder stones, while urethrotomy is performed if the stone location is palpable or seen on imaging. These procedures are practical options for general surgeons in first-level hospitals.
conclusionConcurrent large bladder and urethral stones are uncommon. Endourology or open surgery is typically employed. Treatment selection should be personalized to individual patient assessment to mitigate potential complications effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.