Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38878233›Full record

SynthesisArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024

Prevention of peritoneal adhesions after gynecological surgery: a systematic review.

Sebastian D Schaefer, Ibrahim Alkatout, Nadja Dornhoefer, Joerg Herrmann, Ruediger Klapdor, Ivo Meinhold-Heerlein, Jozsef Meszaros, Alexander Mustea, Peter Oppelt, Markus Wallwiener and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Feasibility and safety of 4DryFieldArchives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Surgical management of uterine fibroids.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Review
  4. Feasibility and Safety of Repeat Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Ipsilateral Local Recurrence: A Case Series.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Cellular and molecular regulation of fibrotic postoperative abdominal adhesions.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sebastian D SchaeferDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clemenshospital Muenster, Münster, Germany. seb.schaefer@alexianer.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8010-1463
Ibrahim AlkatoutDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany.
Nadja DornhoeferDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Joerg HerrmannDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Weimar Hospital, Weimar, Germany.
Ruediger KlapdorDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Albertinen Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Ivo Meinhold-HeerleinDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Jozsef MeszarosDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Alexander MusteaDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Peter OppeltDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Endocrinology, Johannes Kepler University, Kepler University Hospital Linz, Linz, Austria.
Markus WallwienerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany.
Bernhard KraemerDepartment of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

PlantTec Medical GmbH unrestricted educational grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceThe formation of adhesions after gynecological surgery not only has detrimental impacts on those affected, including pain, obstruction, and infertility, but also imposes a high economic burden on healthcare systems worldwide.

objectiveThe aim of this review was to evaluate the adhesion prevention potential of all currently available adhesion barriers for gynecological surgery. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We systematically searched MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the use of adhesion barriers as compared with peritoneal irrigation or no treatment in gynecological surgery. Only RCTs with second-look surgery to evaluate adhesions in the pelvic/abdominal (but not intrauterine) cavity were included.

resultsWe included 45 RCTs with a total of 4,120 patients examining a total of 10 unique types of barriers in second-look gynecological surgery. While RCTs on oxidized regenerated cellulose (significant improvement in 6 of 14 trials), polyethylene glycol with/without other agents (4/10), hyaluronic acid and hyaluronate + carboxymethylcellulose (7/10), icodextrin (1/3), dextran (0/3), fibrin-containing agents (1/2), expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (1/1), N,O-carboxymethylchitosan (0/1), and modified starch (1/1) overall showed inconsistent findings, results for expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, hyaluronic acid, and modified starch yielded the greatest improvements regarding adhesion reduction at 75%, 0-67%, and 85%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Best results for adhesion prevention were reported after applying Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane, hyaluronic acid, and 4DryField

Indexed as

Gynecologic Surgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsFemaleHumansPeritoneal DiseasesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSecond-Look SurgeryTissue AdhesionsAdhesion barrierAdhesion preventionPelvic painPeritoneal adhesionsSecond-look surgery

Identifiers

PMID38878233
PMCPMC11258159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.