Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38878229›Full record

SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2024

The emerging role of robotics in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Laura Awad, Benedict Reed, Edward Bollen, Benjamin J Langridge, Sara Jasionowska, Peter E M Butler, Allan Ponniah

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Robot-Assisted Breast Augmentation.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura AwadCharles Wolfson Centre of Reconstructive Surgery, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK. Laura.awad1@nhs.net.
Benedict ReedCharles Wolfson Centre of Reconstructive Surgery, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Edward BollenCharles Wolfson Centre of Reconstructive Surgery, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Benjamin J LangridgeCharles Wolfson Centre of Reconstructive Surgery, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Sara JasionowskaCharles Wolfson Centre of Reconstructive Surgery, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Peter E M ButlerCharles Wolfson Centre of Reconstructive Surgery, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Allan PonniahCharles Wolfson Centre of Reconstructive Surgery, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of robotics has grown exponentially. There is an active interest amongst practitioners in the transferability of the potential benefits into plastic and reconstructive surgery; however, many plastic surgeons report lack of widespread implementation, training, or clinical exposure. We report the current evidence base, and surgical opportunities, alongside key barriers, and limitations to overcome, to develop the use of robotics within the field. This systematic review of PubMed, Medline, and Embase has been conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024524237). Preclinical, educational, and clinical articles were included, within the scope of plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2, 181, articles were screened; 176 articles met the inclusion criteria across lymph node dissection, flap and microsurgery, vaginoplasty, craniofacial reconstruction, abdominal wall reconstruction and transoral robotic surgery (TOR). A number of benefits have been reported including technical advantages such as better visualisation, improved precision and accuracy, and tremor reduction. Patient benefits include lower rate of complications and quicker recovery; however, there is a longer operative duration in some categories. Cost presents a significant barrier to implementation. Robotic surgery presents an exciting opportunity to improve patient outcomes and surgical ease of use, with feasibility for many subspecialities demonstrated in this review. However, further higher quality comparative research with careful case selection, which is adequately powered, as well as the inclusion of cost-analysis, is necessary to fully understand the true benefit for patient care, and justification for resource utilisation.

Indexed as

Plastic Surgery ProceduresRobotic Surgical ProceduresAbdominal WallFemaleHumansLymph Node ExcisionMicrosurgeryOperative TimePlastic and reconstructive surgeryRoboticRobotic assisted

Identifiers

PMID38878229
PMCPMC11180031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.