SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2024
The emerging role of robotics in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robot-Assisted Breast Augmentation.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- HUGO™ system robotic eTEP technique for ventral hernia repair. A step-by-step medial bottom-up approach.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- National multi-specialty robotic surgery training curriculum and implementation for UK surgical residents: a delphi consensus.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Robot-assisted Computer-Implant surgery : A comprehensive review of system architecture, clinical accuracy, and emerging technologies.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Progress in the Design and Clinical Application of Probes for Fluorescence-Guided Laparoscopic Surgery.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Review
- Global research trends and thematic evolution in robotic craniofacial and facial reconstruction and its enabling digital technologies: a bibliometric and visualisation study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Facial Nerve Repair Using a Microsurgical Robot System: A Preclinical Study Using a Rat Model.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Global trends and research landscape of robotic surgery in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a bibliometric analysis (1999-2025).Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- 4D-Morphing biopolymers in reconstructive plastic surgery: implications, challenges and a call for clinical-translation.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Exploring the Use of Robotics in Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery: A Comprehensive Perspective.Cureus · 2025Review
- Review
- Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) in Head and Neck Reconstruction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Advancing DIEP Flap Surgery: Robotic-Assisted Harvest Reduces Pain and Narcotic Use.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Use of Robotic Surgery in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Narrative Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Robotic Rectus Abdominis Myoperitoneal Flap for Posterior Vaginal Wall Reconstruction: Experience at a Single Institution.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role of robotics has grown exponentially. There is an active interest amongst practitioners in the transferability of the potential benefits into plastic and reconstructive surgery; however, many plastic surgeons report lack of widespread implementation, training, or clinical exposure. We report the current evidence base, and surgical opportunities, alongside key barriers, and limitations to overcome, to develop the use of robotics within the field. This systematic review of PubMed, Medline, and Embase has been conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024524237). Preclinical, educational, and clinical articles were included, within the scope of plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2, 181, articles were screened; 176 articles met the inclusion criteria across lymph node dissection, flap and microsurgery, vaginoplasty, craniofacial reconstruction, abdominal wall reconstruction and transoral robotic surgery (TOR). A number of benefits have been reported including technical advantages such as better visualisation, improved precision and accuracy, and tremor reduction. Patient benefits include lower rate of complications and quicker recovery; however, there is a longer operative duration in some categories. Cost presents a significant barrier to implementation. Robotic surgery presents an exciting opportunity to improve patient outcomes and surgical ease of use, with feasibility for many subspecialities demonstrated in this review. However, further higher quality comparative research with careful case selection, which is adequately powered, as well as the inclusion of cost-analysis, is necessary to fully understand the true benefit for patient care, and justification for resource utilisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.