Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38878145›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics2024

Systematic Evaluation of Osimertinib Population Pharmacokinetic Models in a Cohort of Dutch Adults with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Niels Westra, Paul D Kruithof, Sander Croes, Robin M J M van Geel, Lizza E L Hendriks, Daan J Touw, Thijs H Oude Munnink, Paola Mian

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03858491 (Pharmacokinetic Boosting of Osimertinib in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03858491 early_phase1completednot on this map

Pharmacokinetic Boosting of Osimertinib in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAcademisch Ziekenhuis MaastrichtRan2020 to 2021Enrolled11ConditionsNon Small Cell Lung CancerArmsCobicistat
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Niels WestraDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3370-1618
Paul D KruithofDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Sander CroesDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Robin M J M van GeelDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Lizza E L HendriksDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Daan J TouwDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Thijs H Oude MunninkDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Paola MianDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. p.mian@umcg.nl.

Funding

ZonMw projectnumber 848017002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveSeveral population pharmacokinetic (popPK) studies have been reported that can guide the prediction of osimertinib plasma concentrations in individual patients. It is currently unclear which popPK model offers the best predictive performance and which popPK models are most suitable for nonadherence management and model-informed precision dosing. Therefore, the objective of this study was to externally validate all osimertinib popPK models available in the current literature.

methodsPublished popPK models for osimertinib were constructed using NONMEM version 7.4.4. The predictive quality of the identified models was assessed with goodness-of-fit (GoF) plots, conditional weighted residuals (CWRES) plots and a prediction-corrected visual predictive check (pcVPC) for osimertinib and its active metabolite AZ5104. A subset from the Dutch OSIBOOST trial, where 11 patients with low osimertinib exposure were included, was used as evaluation cohort.

resultsThe population GoF plots for all four models poorly followed the line of identity. For the individual GoF plots, all models performed comparable and were closely distributed among the line of identity. CWRES of the four models were skewed. The pcVPCs of all four models showed a similar trend, where all observed concentrations fell in the simulated shaded areas, but in the lower region of the simulated areas.

conclusionAll four popPK models can be used to individually predict osimertinib concentrations in patients with low osimertinib exposure. For population predictions, all four popPK models performed poorly in patients with low osimertinib exposure. A novel popPK model with good predictive performance should be developed for patients with low osimertinib exposure. Ideally, the cause for the relatively low osimertinib exposure in our evaluation cohort should be known. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03858491.

Indexed as

AcrylamidesAniline CompoundsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsModels, BiologicalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIndolesMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsAcrylamidesAniline CompoundsAntineoplastic AgentsIndolesosimertinibPyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID38878145
PMCPMC11199264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.