ArticleUrolithiasis2024
CT-based radiomics of machine-learning to screen high-risk individuals with kidney stones.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-driven multi-omics integration of urinary organic acids and ions enables precision risk stratification for calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Pre-operatively predicting kidney stone recurrence: integrating radiomic features and clinical variables using machine learning.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Post ureteroscopy stone status, comparing stone free rate and zero fragment rate - does the difference matter ?World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Predicting ESWL success for ureteral stones: a radiomics-based machine learning approach.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Comment on"CT-based radiomics of machine-learning to screen high-risk individuals with kidney stones".Urolithiasis · 2025Article
- Predictive value of the stone-free rate after percutaneous nephrolithotomy based on multiple machine learning models.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Predicting symptomatic kidney stones using machine learning algorithms: insights from the Fasa adults cohort study (FACS).BMC research notes · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Screening high-risk populations is crucial for the prevention and treatment of kidney stones. Here, we employed radiomics to screen high-risk patients for kidney stones. A total of 513 independent kidneys from our hospital between 2020 and 2022 were randomly allocated to training and validation sets at a 7:3 ratio. Radiomic features were extracted using 3Dslicer software. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method was used to select radiomic features from the 107 extracted features, and logistic regression, decision tree, AdaBoost, and support vector machine (SVM) models were subsequently used to construct radiomic feature prediction models. Among these, the logistic regression algorithm demonstrated the best predictive performance and stability. The area under the curve (AUC) of the logistic regression model based on radiomic features was 0.858 in the training cohort and 0.806 in the validation cohort. Furthermore, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the independent risk factors for kidney stones, which were gender and body mass index (BMI). Combining these independent risk factors improved the predictive performance of the model, with AUC values of 0.860 in the training cohort and 0.814 in the validation cohort. Clinical decision curve analysis (DCA) indicated that the radiomic model provided clinical benefit when the probability ranged from 0.2 to 1.0. The radiomic model has a good ability to screen high-risk patients with kidney stones, facilitating early intervention in kidney stone cases and improving patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38878124What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.