Trial reportJournal of Crohn's & colitis2024
Impact of Prior Biologic or Janus Kinase Inhibitor Therapy on Efficacy and Safety of Etrasimod in the ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12 Trials.
Trial report in Journal of Crohn's & colitis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 52-Week Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Etrasimod in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 12-Week Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Etrasimod in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid symptomatic improvement with etrasimod in ulcerative colitis: a post-hoc analysis of the ELEVATE UC program.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2026Trial
- Practical guidelines on medical management of adults with moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2026Article
- Advancing IBD Management: A Literature Review on the Role of Non-Invasive Blood-Based Biomarkers in Predicting and Assessing Pharmacodynamic Response to Treatment.Clinical and translational science · 2026Review
- The efficacy and safety of etrasimod as a first-line advanced therapy for ulcerative colitis: prespecified and post hoc subgroup data from the ELEVATE UC clinical program.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Safety evaluation of etrasimod for ulcerative colitis based on the FAERS database.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Etrasimod in Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: A Comprehensive Review.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2025Review
- The Current Sphingosine 1 Phosphate Receptor Modulators in the Management of Ulcerative Colitis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Ulcerative Colitis: Advances in Pathogenesis, Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Strategies.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Exploring Immune Cell Infiltration and Small Molecule Compounds for Ulcerative Colitis Treatment.Genes · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsEtrasimod is an oral, once daily, selective, sphingosine 1-phosphate [S1P]1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis [UC]. This subgroup analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of etrasimod 2 mg once daily vs placebo by prior biologic/Janus kinase inhibitor [bio/JAKi] exposure in ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12.
methodsPre-defined efficacy endpoints were assessed at Weeks 12 and 52 in ELEVATE UC 52 and Week 12 in ELEVATE UC 12 in bio/JAKi-naïve and -experienced patients, and at Week 12 [pooled] based on prior advanced therapy exposure mechanism.
resultsIn the ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12 analysis populations, 80/274 [29.2%] and 74/222 [33.3%] patients receiving etrasimod and 42/135 [31.1%] and 38/112 [33.9%] patients receiving placebo, respectively, were bio/JAKi-experienced. In both bio/JAKi-naïve and -experienced patients, a significantly greater proportion receiving etrasimod vs placebo achieved clinical remission [p < 0.05] in ELEVATE UC 52 at Weeks 12 [naïve: 30.9% vs 9.7%; experienced: 17.5% vs 2.4%] and 52 [naïve: 36.6% vs 7.5%; experienced: 21.3% vs 4.8%]; in ELEVATE UC 12, this was observed only for bio/JAKi-naïve patients [naïve: 27.7% vs 16.2%, p = 0.033; experienced: 18.9% vs 13.2%, p = 0.349]. Similar patterns were observed for most efficacy endpoints. Among patients with prior anti-integrin exposure [N = 90], a significantly greater proportion achieved clinical response [54.1% vs 27.6%, p = 0.030], but not clinical remission [9.8% vs 3.4%, p = 0.248], with etrasimod vs placebo.
conclusionsBio/JAKi-naïve and -experienced patients had clinically meaningful induction and maintenance treatment benefits with etrasimod vs placebo. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT03945188; NCT03996369.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.