Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38877879›Full record

Observational studySleep2024

The role of retinal irradiance estimates in melanopsin-driven retinal responsivity: a reanalysis of the post-illumination pupil response in seasonal affective disorder.

Alison M Klevens, Maddison L Taylor, Delainey L Wescott, Paul D Gamlin, Peter L Franzen, Brant P Hasler, Greg Siegle, Kathryn A Roecklein

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Sleep, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alison M KlevensDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4713-6015
Maddison L TaylorDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Delainey L WescottDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6884-3846
Paul D GamlinDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Peter L FranzenDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Brant P HaslerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3123-1106
Greg SiegleDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1420-8975
Kathryn A RoeckleinDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5206-8283

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001857 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2016 to 2025
$129.3M
Melanopsin photosensitivity and psychopathologyR01MH103313 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ROECKLEIN, KATHRYN A · 2014 to 2018
$2.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001857NIH HHS MH096199, MH103313, and UL1TR001857NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH103313
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To isolate melanopsin contributions to retinal sensitivity measured by the post-illumination pupil response (PIPR), controlling for individual differences in non-melanopsin contributions including retinal irradiance is required. When methodologies to negate such differences present barriers, statistical controls have included age, baseline diameter, iris pigmentation, and circadian time of testing. Alternatively, the pupil light reflex (PLR) and calculations estimating retinal irradiance both reflect retinal irradiance, while the PLR also reflects downstream pathways. We reanalyzed data from an observational, correlational study comparing the PIPR across seasons in seasonal affective disorder (SAD) and controls. The PIPR was measured in 47 adults in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (25 SAD) over 50 seconds after 1 second of red and blue stimuli of 15.3 log photons/cm2/s. The PLR was within 1 second while PIPR was averaged over 10-40 seconds post-stimulus. Two raters ranked iris pigmentation using a published scale. We evaluated model fit using Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) across different covariate sets. The best-fitting models included either estimated retinal irradiance or PLR, and circadian time of testing. The PLR is collected contemporaneously in PIPR studies and is an individually specific measure of nonspecific effects, while being minimally burdensome. This work extends the prior publication by introducing theoretically grounded covariates that improved analytic model fits based on AIC specific to the present methods and sample. Such quantitative methods could be helpful in studies which must balance participant and researcher burden against tighter methodological controls of individual differences in retinal irradiance.

Indexed as

Reflex, PupillaryRetinaRod OpsinsSeasonal Affective DisorderAdultFemaleHumansLightMaleMelanopsinMiddle AgedPhotic StimulationPupilMelanopsinRod Opsinsagecircadianlifespanmelanopsinpupillometrysleep

Identifiers

PMID38877879
PMCPMC11381569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.