Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38877843›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of surgery2024

Intrarenal pressure with hand-pump or pressurized-bag irrigation: randomized clinical trial at retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Stefanie M Croghan, Sorcha O'Meara, Eoghan M Cunnane, Helen Purtill, Michael T Walsh, Fergal J O'Brien, Rustom P Manecksha, Barry B McGuire, Kieran J Breen, Niall F Davis

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Stefanie M CroghanStrategic Academic Recruitment (StAR) Programme, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Sorcha O'MearaStrategic Academic Recruitment (StAR) Programme, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Eoghan M CunnaneSchool of Engineering, Bernal Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Helen PurtillDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Michael T WalshSchool of Engineering, Bernal Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Fergal J O'BrienTissue Engineering Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Regenerative Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Rustom P ManeckshaDepartment of Urology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Barry B McGuireDepartment of Urology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Kieran J BreenDepartment of Urology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Niall F DavisDepartment of Urology, Blackrock Clinic, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

Blackrock ClinicBoston ScientificBoston Scientific Investigator-Sponsored Research ProgrammeStARStrategic Academic Recruitment
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim was to ascertain the impact of irrigation technique on human intrarenal pressure during retrograde intrarenal surgery.

methodsA parallel randomized trial recruited patients across three hospital sites. Patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stone treatment with an 11/13-Fr ureteral access sheath were allocated randomly to 100 mmHg pressurized-bag (PB) or manual hand-pump (HP) irrigation. The primary outcome was mean procedural intrarenal pressure. Secondary outcomes included maximum intrarenal pressure, variance, visualization, HP force of usage, procedure duration, stone clearance, and clinical outcomes. Live intrarenal pressure monitoring was performed using a COMETTMII pressure guidewire, deployed cystoscopically to the renal pelvis. The operating team was blinded to the intrarenal pressure.

resultsThirty-eight patients were randomized between July and November 2023 (trial closure). The final analysis included 34 patients (PB 16; HP 18). Compared with PB irrigation, HP irrigation resulted in significantly higher mean intrarenal pressure (mean(s.d.) 62.29(27.45) versus 38.16(16.84) mmHg; 95% c.i. for difference in means (MD) 7.97 to 40.29 mmHg; P = 0.005) and maximum intrarenal pressure (192.71(106.23) versus 68.04(24.16) mmHg; 95% c.i. for MD 70.76 to 178.59 mmHg; P < 0.001), along with greater variance in intrarenal pressure (log transformed) (6.23(1.59) versus 4.60(1.30); 95% c.i. for MD 0.62 to 2.66; P = 0.001). Surgeon satisfaction with procedural vision reported on a scale of 10 was higher with PB compared with HP irrigation (mean(s.d.) 8.75(0.58) versus 6.28(1.27); 95% c.i. for MD 1.79 to 3.16; P < 0.001). Subjective HP usage force did not correlate significantly with transmitted intrarenal pressure (Pearson R = -0.15, P = 0.57). One patient (HP arm) developed urosepsis.

conclusionManual HP irrigation resulted in higher and more fluctuant intrarenal pressure trace (with inferior visual clarity) than 100-mmHg PB irrigation. REGISTRATION NUMBER: osf.io/jmg2h (https://osf.io/).

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiPressureTherapeutic IrrigationAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID38877843
PMCPMC11179103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.