Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38877493›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Barriers to help-seeking, accessing and providing mental health support for medical students: a mixed methods study using the candidacy framework.

Elena Sheldon, Naseeb Ezaydi, Lauren Desoysa, Jasmine Young, Melanie Simmonds-Buckley, Prof Daniel Hind, Prof Chris Burton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elena SheldonDivision of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. e.m.sheldon@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1927-471X
Naseeb EzaydiDivision of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2642-1108
Lauren DesoysaDivision of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Jasmine YoungSchool of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Melanie Simmonds-BuckleyDepartment of Psychology, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3808-4134
Prof Daniel HindDivision of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6409-4793
Prof Chris BurtonDivision of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0233-2431

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe mental health of medical students is a national and international problem increasing in both demand and acuity. Medical students face barriers to accessing mental health support that is clinically effective, timely and appropriate for their needs. This mixed methods study aimed to explore experiences of these barriers and the challenges to health service delivery aligned to the Candidacy Framework.

methodsOne hundred three medical students studying at The University of Sheffield completed an online survey comprising the CCAPS-34 and follow-up questions about service access and use. Semi-structured interviews with a nested sample of 20 medical students and 10 healthcare professionals explored barriers to service access and provision. A stakeholder panel of medical students and professionals met quarterly to co-produce research materials, interpret research data and identify touchpoints by pinpointing specific areas and moments of interaction between a medical student as a service user and a mental health service.

resultsMedical students who experienced barriers to help-seeking and accessing support scored significantly higher for psychological symptoms on the CCAPS-34. Uncertainty and fear of fitness to practice processes were important barriers present across all seven stages of candidacy. The fragmented structure of local services, along with individual factors such as perceived stigma and confidentiality concerns, limited the progression of medical students through the Candidacy Framework (a framework for understanding the different stages of a person's journey to healthcare).

conclusionThis study outlines important areas of consideration for mental health service provision and policy development to improve access to and the quality of care for medical students.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityMental Health ServicesStudents, MedicalAdultFemaleHelp-Seeking BehaviorHumansInterviews as TopicMalePatient Acceptance of Health CareQualitative ResearchSocial StigmaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAccess to health careCandidacy FrameworkMedical studentMental healthMixed Methods Research

Identifiers

PMID38877493
PMCPMC11179297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.