ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024
Prognosis of remaining fetus in twin pregnancy after demise of one fetus according to its location.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo investigate the prognosis of the remaining fetus in twin pregnancy after experiencing one fetal demise in the first trimester according to the location of the demised fetus.
methodsThis was a retrospective study of twin pregnancies with one fetal demise after the first trimester (14 weeks of gestation) delivered between September 2004 and September 2022. The study population was divided into two groups based on the location of the demised fetus as determined by the last recorded ultrasonography results: Group 1 included twin pregnancies where the presenting fetus was demised (n = 36) and Group 2 included twin pregnancies where the non-presenting fetus was demised (n = 44). The obstetric and neonatal outcomes were also reviewed.
resultsA total of 80 pregnant women were included. The median gestational age for the diagnosis of fetal demise was 24.1 weeks. The gestational age of the demised fetus was not different between Groups 1 and 2; however, the gestational age of the remaining fetus at delivery was significantly earlier in Group 1 than it was in Group 2 (33.8 vs. 37.3 weeks, P = .004). The rate of preterm birth before 28 weeks was almost five times higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (22.2% vs. 4.5%, P = .037). Regression analysis demonstrated significant differences between Groups 1 and 2. Respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, patent ductus arteriosus, retinopathy of prematurity, and jaundice were more common in Group 1 than in Group 2; however, the association was not significant after adjusting for gestational age at delivery.
conclusionsWhen the presenting fetus is demised in a twin pregnancy, the remaining fetus tends to be delivered earlier than when the non-presenting fetus is demised.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.