Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38877151›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Effects of expanded graphite's structural and elemental characteristics on its oil and heavy metal sorption properties.

Divan Coetzee, Thammasak Rojviroon, Sumonman Niamlang, Jiři Militký, Jakub Wiener, Josef Večerník, Jana Melicheríková, Jana Müllerová

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Divan CoetzeeDepartment of Materials Engineering, Faculty of Textile Engineering, Technická Univerzita v Liberci, 460 01, Liberec, Czech Republic. divan.coetzee@tul.cz.
Thammasak RojviroonDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi (RMUTT), Klong 6, Thanyaburi, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Sumonman NiamlangDepartment of Materials and Metallurgical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi (RMUTT), Klong 6, Thanyaburi, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Jiři MilitkýDepartment of Materials Engineering, Faculty of Textile Engineering, Technická Univerzita v Liberci, 460 01, Liberec, Czech Republic.
Jakub WienerDepartment of Materials Engineering, Faculty of Textile Engineering, Technická Univerzita v Liberci, 460 01, Liberec, Czech Republic.
Josef VečerníkDepartment of Materials Engineering (Laboratory Alšovice), Faculty of Textile Engineering, Technická Univerzita v Liberci, 460 01, Liberec, Czech Republic.
Jana MelicheríkováInstitute for Nanomaterials, Advanced Technologies and Innovation, Technical University of Liberec, Bendlova 7, Liberec, 460 01, Czech Republic.
Jana MüllerováDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Humanities and Pedagogy, Technická Univerzita v Liberci, 460 01, Liberec, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expanded graphite has promising potential environmental applications due to its porous structure and oleophilic nature, which allow it to absorb large quantities of oil. The material is produced by intercalating graphite and applying heat to convert the intercalant into gas to cause expansion between the layers in the graphite. Using different intercalants and temperature conditions results in varying properties of expanded graphite. This work has proven that the sorption properties of commercial expanded graphite differ significantly due to the material's structural and elemental characteristics, which can be attributed to the intercalation method. This resulted in various degrees of exfoliation of the graphite and possible functionalisation of the graphene sheets within the structure. This affected the material's sorption capacity and its affinity for heavy metal sorption by incorporating selectivity towards the sorption of certain metals. It was found that sample EG3, which underwent a less harsh expansion, exhibited lower porosity than EG1, and thus, the sample absorbed less oil at 37.29 g/g compared to the more expanded samples EG1 and EG2 with 55.16 g/g and 48.82 g/g, respectively. However, it was able to entrap a wider variety of metal particles compared to EG1 and EG2, possibly due to its smaller cavities allowing for a capillary effect between the graphene sheets and greater Van der Waals forces. A second possibility is that ionic or coordination complexes could form with certain metals due to the possible functionalisation of the expanded graphite during the intercalation process. This would be in addition to coordination between the metals and expanded graphite carbon atoms. The findings suggest that there is evidence of functionalisation as determined by XRD and elemental analyses. However, further investigation is necessary to confirm this hypothesis. The findings in this work suggest that the first mechanism of sorption was more likely to be related to the degree of expansion of the expanded graphite. Various metals are present in used oil, and their removal can be challenging. Some metals in oil are not considered heavy since they have a relatively low density but can be associated with heavy metals in terms of toxicity.

Indexed as

Crude oil purificationExpanded graphiteHeavy metal sorptionOil filtrationOil sorption

Identifiers

PMID38877151
PMCPMC11178900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.