Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38877140›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Artificial intelligence in diagnostic radiology for dose management : Advances and perspectives using the example of computed tomography].

Laura Garajová, Stephan Garbe, Alois M Sprinkart

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura GarajováKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland.
Stephan GarbeKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland.
Alois M SprinkartKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland. Sprinkart@uni-bonn.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CLINICAL-METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEM: Imaging procedures employing ionizing radiation require compliance with European directives and national regulations in order to protect patients. Each exposure must be indicated, individually adapted, and documented. Unacceptable dose exceedances must be detected and reported. These tasks are time-consuming and require meticulous diligence. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL

methodsComputed tomography (CT) is the most important contributor to medical radiation exposure. Optimizing the patient's dose is therefore mandatory. Use of modern technology and reconstruction algorithms already reduces exposure. Checking the indication, planning, and performing the examination are further important process steps with regard to radiation protection. Patient exposure is usually monitored by dose management systems (DMS). In special cases, a risk assessment is required by calculating the organ doses. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted techniques are increasingly used in various steps of the process: they support examination planning, improve patient positioning, and enable automated scan length adjustments. They also provide real-time estimates of individual organ doses. EVALUATION: The integration of AI into medical imaging is proving successful in terms of dose optimization in various areas of the radiological workflow, from reconstruction to examination planning and performing exams. However, the use of AI in conjunction with DMS has not yet been considered on a large scale. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATION: AI processes offer promising tools to support dose management. However, their implementation in the clinical setting requires further research, extensive validation, and continuous monitoring.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRadiation DosageRadiation ProtectionTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansDiagnostic reference valuesDose management systemsDose optimizationPatient-specific dosimetryRadiation protection

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.